c

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

OR

Commission File Number 000-56363

TERRASCEND CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (717) 610-4165

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Shares

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity (on an as-converted basis, based on the closing price of these shares on the Canadian Securities Exchange (the "CSE")) on June 30, 2023, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $351,317,574.

The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Share (as defined below) outstanding as of March 14, 2024 was 291,215,585.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Table of Contents

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains statements that TerrAscend Corp. (the "Issuer") believes are, or may be considered to be, “forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report regarding the prospects of the industry in which the Issuer, its subsidiaries, TerrAscend Growth Corp. (“TerrAscend”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company”) operate or the Company’s prospects, plans, financial position or business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "can", “expect”, “likely”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “potential”, “proposed”, “estimate” and other similar words, including negative and grammatical variations thereof, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” happen, or by discussions of strategy. Forward-looking statements include estimates, plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, targets, guidance, or other statements that are not statements of fact. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:

Certain of the forward-looking statements contained herein concerning the cannabis industry and the general expectations of the Company concerning the cannabis industry are based on estimates prepared by the Company using data from publicly-available governmental sources as well as from market research and industry analysis and on assumptions based on data and knowledge of the cannabis industry. Such data is inherently imprecise. The cannabis industry involves risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on various factors, which factors are described further below.

With respect to the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report, the Company has made assumptions regarding, among other things: (i) its ability to generate cash flows from operations and obtain necessary financing on acceptable terms; (ii) general economic, financial market, regulatory and political conditions in jurisdictions in which the Company operates; (iii) the output from the Company’s operations; (iv) consumer interest in the Company’s products; (v) competition in the cannabis industry; (vi) anticipated and unanticipated costs; (vii) government regulation of the Company’s activities and products; (viii) government regulation of licensing, taxation and environmental protection; (ix) the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; (x) the Company’s ability to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; (xi) the Company’s ability to conduct operations in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xii) the Company’s construction plans and timeframe for completion of such plans.

Readers are cautioned that the above list of cautionary statements is not exhaustive. Known and unknown risks, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, current and future market conditions; risks related to federal, state, provincial, territorial, local and foreign government laws, rules and regulations, including federal and state laws in the United States relating to cannabis operations in the United States; and those discussed under Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report and in the "Risk Factor Summary" below. The purpose of forward-looking statements is to provide the reader with a description of management’s expectations, and such forward-looking statements may not be appropriate for any other purpose. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. The Company can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this Annual Report and are based on the beliefs, estimates, expectations and opinions of management on the date such forward-looking statements are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, estimates or opinions, future events or results or otherwise or to explain any material difference between subsequent actual events and such forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law.

Risk Factor Summary

Investing in the Common Shares involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described in Item 1A – “Risk Factors” beginning on page 26 of this Annual Report before deciding to invest in the Common Shares. If any of these risks actually occur, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could likely be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the Common Shares may decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Set forth below is a summary of some of the principal risks that the Company faces:

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

The Company is a leading North American cannabis company. The Company has vertically integrated licensed operations in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, Maryland and California. In addition, the Company has retail operations in Ontario, Canada with a majority-owned dispensary in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Notwithstanding the fact that various states in the United States have implemented medical cannabis laws or have otherwise legalized the use of cannabis, the use of cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law for any purpose, by way of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (the "Controlled Substances Act").

The Company operates under one operating segment, which is the cultivation, production and sale of cannabis products.

The Company owns a portfolio of operating businesses, including:

The Issuer’s head office and registered office is located at 77 City Centre Drive, Suite 501 - East Tower, Mississauga, Ontario, L5B 1M5, Canada.

The Company’s telephone number is +1 (717) 610-4165 and its website is www.terrascend.com. Information contained on or accessible through the Company's website is not part of this Annual Report, and the inclusion of the Company's website address in this Annual Report is an inactive textual reference only.

Operating Businesses and Brands

The Company is a leading North American cannabis company. The Company has vertically integrated licensed operations in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, Maryland and California. In addition, the Company has retail operations in Ontario, Canada with a majority-owned dispensary in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Company is committed to safely cultivating the highest quality cannabis products in order to elevate the lives of its patients and customers with a vision to keep growing and using the transformative power of cannabis to positively impact as many lives as possible. See the section titled “Acquisitions” for more information regarding the Company’s acquisitions.

The Company operates seven cultivation and processing facilities and thirty-eight operational dispensaries serving thousands of medical patients and adult-use consumers across North America. The Company offers six premium brands in a variety of product types including flower, vaporizables, concentrates, topicals, tinctures, and edibles. The Company also produces and sells an assorted product offering from two premium licensed brands, Cookies and Wana.

The Company’s in-house product brand portfolio has the following brand values:

The Company produces and sells products under third-party licensed brands in some markets, which consists of:

The Company's dispensary retail stores are branded as:

TerrAscend NJ

The Company, is a vertically integrated cultivator, processor and dispenser in New Jersey’s northern region. The Company, through its majority-owned subsidiary TerrAscend NJ, LLC, cultivates and processes medical and adult-use cannabis, and currently operates three Apothecarium-branded dispensaries in Phillipsburg, Lodi, and Maplewood, New Jersey. The Company operates a 16-acre site in Boonton Township, Morris County that currently has a cultivation and processing facility with a total footprint of approximately 140,000 square feet with the ability to further expand on the site. In addition to cultivation, the

Company is engaged in the manufacturing of a wide range of branded form factors including vaporizables, concentrates, topicals, tinctures and edibles.

The Company is the exclusive manufacturer, supplier, and commercialization partner of Wana and Cookies in New Jersey, producing these branded products for wholesale and retail distribution in the state.

TerrAscend MD

The Company is a vertically integrated cultivator, processor and dispenser in Maryland. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary WDB Holding MD, Inc. (“WDB MD”) and TER Holding MD, Inc. (“TER MD”), holds one cultivation license, one processor license, and four retail licenses. The Company has a cultivation and processing operation, including a newly renovated state-of-the-art 150,000 square foot facility located in Hagerstown, Maryland. The Company is engaged in the extraction, processing and manufacturing of a wide-range of branded form factors including vaporizables, concentrates, topicals, tinctures and edibles. In addition, the Company operates four Apothecarium branded retail dispensaries, in Cumberland, Salisbury, Parkville, and Burtonsville.

The Company is the exclusive manufacturer, supplier, and commercialization partner of Wana and Cookies in Maryland, producing these branded products for wholesale and retail distribution in the state.

TerrAscend PA

The Company is a vertically integrated cultivator, processor and dispenser in Pennsylvania. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary WDB Holding PA, Inc. (“WDB PA”), holds a cultivation, a processor, and six retail licenses in Pennsylvania. The Company, through Ilera Healthcare LLC (“Ilera”), has a 150,000 square foot grower and processor operation located in Waterfall, Pennsylvania. The Company distributes its product lines, including vaporizables, tinctures, and topicals broadly across dispensaries throughout Pennsylvania. In addition, the Company operates six Apothecarium branded retail dispensaries, in Plymouth Meeting, Lancaster, Thorndale, Bethlehem, Allentown and Stroudsburg. In addition to cultivation, the Company is engaged in the manufacturing of a wide range of branded form factors including vaporizables, concentrates, topicals, and tinctures.

The Company is the exclusive manufacturer, supplier, and commercialization partner of Cookies in Pennsylvania, producing these branded products for wholesale and retail distribution in the state.

TerrAscend MI

The Company is a vertically-integrated cultivator, processor and dispenser in Michigan. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary WDB Holding MI, Inc. (“WDB MI”), holds nine operational “Class C” cultivation licenses, five Class C’s with local approvals, three excess grower licenses (equivalent to a Class C license), three processing licenses and nineteen provisioning centers or dispensaries. The Company has cultivation and processing facilities located in Harrison and Monitor, Michigan. The Company operates eight Gage branded dispensaries, five Pinnacle branded dispensaries, five Cookies branded dispensaries, and one Lemonnade branded dispensary.

The Company is the exclusive manufacturer, supplier, and commercialization partner of Cookies in Michigan, producing these branded products for wholesale and retail distribution in the state.

TerrAscend CA

The Company is a vertically-integrated cultivator and dispenser in California. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary WDB Holding CA, Inc. (“WDB CA") holds licenses for cultivation, distribution, and retail operations. The Company has a cultivation operation located in San Francisco, California. The Company operates five Apothecarium branded retail dispensaries, including three in San Francisco, one in Berkeley and one in Capitola.

Florida Business - Arise

In 2023, TerrAscend, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Arise Bioscience, Inc. (“Arise”), engaged in the production and distribution of innovative hemp-derived wellness products. Arise’s whole-plant hemp extract products were made in the United States and were sold in retail locations in the United States. Effective March 1, 2023, the Company sold substantially all of the Arise assets, including all intellectual property and inventory, to a third party.

TerrAscend Canada

TerrAscend Canada sells cannabis in Ontario, Canada from its Cookies Canada retail dispensary. TerrAscend Canada’s principal business activities include the retail sale of recreational (“recreational” or “adult-use”) cannabis to consumers. TerrAscend Canada was previously a Licensed Producer (as such term is defined in the Cannabis Act, SC 2018, c 16 (the "Cannabis Act")) of cannabis until the Company commenced an optimization of its operations in Canada, whereby the Company reduced its manufacturing footprint to focus on its Canadian retail business, as well as to monetize its intellectual property portfolio in Canada. Prior to the optimization of its operations, TerrAscend Canada operated out of a 67,300 square foot facility located in Mississauga, Ontario and was licensed to cultivate, process and sell cannabis for medical and adult-use purposes. These licenses allowed for sales of dried cannabis, cannabis oil and extracts, topicals, and edibles. The Company ceased operations at TerrAscend Canada’s manufacturing facility during the three months ended December 31, 2022. As such, the Canadian Licensed Producer results are presented in discontinued operations in this Annual Report.

Reorganization

Entry into the U.S. Cannabis Market and Capital Reorganization

The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on March 7, 2017. At the time the Company had limited operations in the United States and did not engage in the business of, or derive any revenue from, the cultivation, distribution or possession of cannabis in the United States. On October 9, 2018, the Company announced its intention to pursue growth opportunities in the U.S. cannabis market, including potential acquisitions of operators in states that had legalized cannabis for medical or adult-use. In connection therewith, the Company began exploring potential acquisition targets with significant market share and strong brand recognition. To support this strategy, the Company entered into an agreement with Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth”), RIV Capital Inc. (formerly Canopy Rivers Inc., “RIV Capital”), and entities controlled by Jason Wild, chairman of the Company (JW Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd., JW Partners, LP, and Pharmaceutical Opportunities Fund, LP) to reorganize the capital of the Company (the "Reorganization”) and obtain waivers of certain contractual covenants that at the time, restricted the Company from operating in the United States. The Company's Reorganization was implemented by way of a statutory plan of arrangement on the terms set out in the Arrangement Agreement and was subject to court approval, the approval of the Company’s shareholders, and other customary conditions. The Reorganization was completed on November 30, 2018.

Acquisitions

Acquisition of Grander Assets

On December 24, 2018, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Grander, a manufacturer and distributor of hemp-derived wellness products. The transaction closed on January 15, 2019. Substantially all of the operating assets of Grander were indirectly acquired by the Company through Arise, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend. Grander ceased operations in 2024.

Acquisition of the Apothecarium Dispensaries in California

On June 6, 2019, the Company closed a series of transactions to acquire controlling interests in three entities in California operating under The Apothecarium-branded retail dispensary ("Apothecarium 2019 Acquisition"). The transactions also included the acquisition of two additional entities that were seeking to operate in Northern California, which were ultimately opened in Berkeley and Capitola, and the acquisition of Valhalla, a leading provider of premium edible products. The Company acquired 49.9% of the outstanding equity interests of the entities operating three Apothecarium-branded retail dispensary located in San Francisco and had the right (or, in certain circumstances, obligation) to acquire the remaining equity interests of such entities post-closing, following receipt of certain regulatory approvals. As consideration, the Company paid $71,854, comprised of: (i) $36,837 in cash, (ii) $813 in the form of a working capital adjustment, (iii) contingent consideration of $3,363 and (iv) 6,700 proportionate voting shares in the capital of the Company (“Proportionate Voting Shares”), valued at $30,841. TerrAscend retained 100% of the economics of the entities operating the three San Francisco locations and the Berkeley and Capitola locations of The Apothecarium dispensaries through control of such entities. On January 19, 2024, the Company acquired the remaining 50.1% of the outstanding equity interest in the three the Apothecarium-branded retail dispensary located in San Francisco, each, therefore, becoming a whole-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend ("Apothecarium 2024 Acquisition"). As consideration, the Company paid $3,700, comprised of 2,105,549 Common Shares.

Acquisition of Ilera

On September 16, 2019, the Company, through WDB Holding PA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend, acquired 100% of the equity of the entities comprising Ilera for total consideration of $225,000 comprised of a combination of cash and Common Shares. At closing, the Company paid the sellers $25,000 in cash, subject to customary closing adjustments, an additional $25,000 worth of Proportionate Voting Shares equivalent to approximately 5,059.102 Proportionate Voting Shares (which are each exchangeable for 1,000 Common Shares), and $601,000 in working capital adjustments. Additional cash consideration of $175,000 in aggregate was paid to the sellers based on Ilera achieving certain specified sales and profitability targets, with staggered payments made in 2020 and 2021. On June 30, 2021 the final earn-out had been calculated and remaining fair value amount of $29,700 was paid on that date.

Acquisition of State Flower

On January 23, 2020, the Company obtained control of ABI SF, LLC ("State Flower"), a premium California cannabis brand that is currently sold through dispensaries in California. As consideration, the Company converted its previously-issued note receivable and accrued interest in the amount of $3,032 into a 49.9% equity interest in State Flower ("State Flower Acquisition"). The Company also recorded contingent consideration payable of $6,630, representing the expected consideration payable to acquire the remaining 50.1% of State Flower, which comprises 100% of its preferred shares, subject to regulatory approval. The Company retained 100% of the economics of State Flower through control of State Flower and has the right to acquire the remaining equity interests of State Flower, following receipt of certain regulatory approvals. On December 31, 2021, the final earn-out was calculated. The Company made a payment of $7,000 in January 2022. On January 19, 2024, the Company acquired the remaining 50.1% of the equity interest in State Flower, as a result of which State Flower became a wholly-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend.

Acquisition of HMS

On May 3, 2021, the Company, through WDB MD, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend, acquired HMS Health, LLC ("HMS Health"), a cultivator of cannabis flower for the wholesale medical cannabis market in Maryland. The Company acquired 100% of the equity of HMS Health as well as the rights to acquire 100% of the equity interest in HMS Processing, LLC ("HMS Processing"), a processor of cannabis flower, following receipt of certain regulatory approvals, for total consideration of $24,488, comprised of: (i) $22,399 in cash and (ii) a $2,089 promissory note, bearing 5.0% annual interest, which was settled when due in April 2022. On January 31, 2022, the Company acquired 100% of the interest in HMS Processing, which resulted in both HMS Processing and HMS Health becoming wholly-owned subsidiaries of TerrAscend.

Acquisition of KCR

On April 30, 2021, the Company, through WDB Holding PA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TerrAscend, acquired Guadco, LLC and KCR Holdings LLC (collectively “KCR”). In connection with the acquisition of KCR ("KCR Acquisition"), the Company acquired three retail dispensaries located in Bethlehem, Allentown and Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. Prior to the acquisition, the Company owned 10% of KCR. The Company acquired the remaining 90% of the equity interest in KCR for total consideration of $69,847, comprised of: (i) $34,427 in Common Shares, (ii) $20,506 in cash, (iii) $7,101 related to the fair value of previously owned shares, (iv) a contingent consideration payable, with a value of $1,063 , and (v) a $6,750 promissory note, bearing 10% annual interest, which was settled when due in April 2022.

New Jersey Partnership

On August 20, 2021, the Company purchased an additional 12.5% equity interest in TerrAscend NJ, LLC from BWH NJ, LLC and Blue Marble Ventures, LLC (in addition to its existing 75% equity interest). The total cash consideration was $50,000, which was paid during the year ended December 31, 2021. Upon closing of the acquisition, the Company owns 87.5% of the issued and outstanding equity of TerrAscend NJ, LLC.

The Company had the option to purchase an additional 6.25% equity interest in TerrAscend NJ, LLC, for a total equity interest of 93.75%, at a predetermined valuation during the period commencing April 1, 2023 through June 15, 2023, but did not elect to exercise.

Acquisition of Gage Growth

On March 10, 2022, the Company closed the acquisition of Gage Growth (the "Gage Acquisition"), pursuant to terms of an arrangement agreement between the Company and Gage Growth (the "Gage Arrangement Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Gage Arrangement Agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding subordinate voting shares of Gage Growth. Pursuant to the terms of the Gage Arrangement Agreement, Gage shareholders received .3001 of a Common

Share for each Gage share (or equivalent) held. In connection with the Gage Acquisition, the Company issued: (i) 51,349,978 Common Shares valued at $242,884, (ii) 13,504,500 exchangeable share units valued at $66,591, (iii) 4,940,364 replacement stock options with a fair value of $13,147, and (iv) 282,023 replacement warrants with a fair value of $435.

Acquisition of Pinnacle

On August 23, 2022, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests in Pinnacle, a dispensary operator in Michigan, and related real estate, for total consideration of $31,003, comprised of: (i) $12,327 in cash (the "Pinnacle Cash Consideration"), (ii) two promissory notes in an aggregate amount of $10,000, each bearing interest at a rate of 6.0% which was to mature on June 23, 2023, (iii) 4,803,184 Common Shares valued at $7,926 (the "Pinnacle Share Consideration"), and (iv) contingent consideration payable, valued at $750. Subject to compliance with securities laws, the Common Shares issued in connection with the Pinnacle Share Consideration were subject to a contractual lock-up period, with one-third of the Common Shares vesting on each of the 30, 60 and 90 day anniversary of the closing date of the transaction. The Pinnacle Cash Consideration included repayments of indebtedness and transaction expenses on behalf of Pinnacle of $3,913 and $619 respectively. In connection with the Pinnacle Acquisition, the Company acquired six retail dispensary licenses, five of which are currently operational and located in the cities of Addison, Buchanan, Camden, Edmore, and Morenci, Michigan.

Acquisition of AMMD

On January 8, 2022, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Allegany Medical Marijuana Dispensary ("AMMD"), a medical dispensary located in Cumberland, Maryland from Moose Curve Holdings, LLC (the "AMMD Acquisition"). On January 27, 2023, the Company closed the AMMD Acquisition. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired a 100% of the outstanding equity interest in AMMD for total consideration of $10,000 in cash (the "AMMD Cash Consideration). The AMMD Cash Consideration paid included a long-term lease with the option to purchase the real estate and repayments of indebtedness and transaction expenses on behalf of AMMD of $160 and $29, respectively.

Acquisition of Peninsula

On June 28, 2023, in order to expand its retail footprint in Maryland, the Company closed the acquisition of Derby 1, LLC ("Peninsula"), a dispensary located in Salisbury, Maryland (the "Peninsula Acquisition"). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests in Peninsula for total consideration of $15,394 exclusive of assumed financing obligations of $7,226. The consideration was comprised of: (i) 5,442,282 Common Shares (the "Peninsula Share Consideration"), valued at $7,857, (ii) a $3,646 secured promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 7.25% and maturing on June 28, 2026, and (iii) $2,657 of contingent consideration in connection with the Peninsula Share Consideration ("Peninsula Contingent Consideration"), and (iv) $1,234 in cash (the "Peninsula Cash Consideration"). The Peninsula Cash Consideration included transaction expenses and repayments of indebtedness on behalf of Peninsula of $290 and $33, respectively. The Peninsula Share Consideration was subject to a statutory lock-up restriction of 6 months, and therefore, a share restriction discount was considered in determining the fair value of the Peninsula Share Consideration on the date of issuance. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed that if within 18 months from the date of issuance of the Peninsula Share Consideration, the aggregate gross proceeds resulting from the sales of the Common Shares plus the aggregate value of the remaining Common Shares was less than $9,000, the Company was required to pay the difference to the sellers.

Acquisition of Blue Ridge

On June 30, 2023, the Company closed the acquisition of Hempaid, LLC ("Blue Ridge"), a medical dispensary located in Parkville, Maryland (the "Blue Ridge Acquisition"). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired a 100% equity interest in Blue Ridge for total consideration of $6,277, comprised of: (i) a promissory note of $3,109 bearing interest at a rate of 7.0% and maturing on June 30, 2027 and (ii) $3,168 in cash (the "Blue Ridge Cash Consideration"). The Blue Ridge Cash Consideration included repayments of indebtedness and transaction expenses on behalf of Blue Ridge of $707 and $281, respectively. The Company has plans to relocate Blue Ridge to a new, high-traffic retail center in the beginning of 2024.

Acquisition of Herbiculture

On July 10, 2023, the Company closed the acquisition of Herbiculture Inc. (“Herbiculture”), a medical dispensary in Maryland (the "Herbiculture Acquisition"). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired 100% equity interest in Herbiculture for total consideration of $7,710, comprised of: (i) $2,776 in cash ("Herbiculture Cash Consideration"), and (ii) a promissory note of $4,934 bearing interest at a rate of 10.50%, and maturing on June 30, 2026. The Herbiculture Cash Consideration included transaction expenses and repayments of indebtedness on behalf of Herbiculture of $616 and $1,674, respectively.

Principal Products

The Company offers a competitive product portfolio, ranging from flower, concentrates, vaporizables, edibles, tinctures, topicals, and/or accessories, in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company strives to develop and introduce innovative products to serve patients’ and customers’ unique needs.

Principal Markets

The Company currently has operations in Canada, through TerrAscend Canada, and in the United States, through TerrAscend. In the United States, TerrAscend sells cannabis products in Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland and California. In Canada, TerrAscend Canada operates its Cookies Canada retail business and is monetizing its intellectual property portfolio. The Company’s business is not generally cyclical or seasonal in nature.

Distribution Methods

In the United States, TerrAscend distributes its branded products across dispensaries in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Michigan and California. In Canada, the Company sells its products to consumers in Ontario through TerrAscend Canada.

Sources and Availability of Materials

The Company either grows or procures the primary component of its finished products, namely cannabis. TerrAscend’s cultivation operations in the United States are dependent on a number of key inputs and their related costs including raw materials and supplies related to its growing operations, as well as electricity, water and other utilities.

Specialized Knowledge and Skills

The Company’s business requires specialized skills and knowledge. The Company believes its team has developed and sourced business systems to effectively and efficiently operate its wholesale operations and retail cannabis operations in the jurisdictions in which it operates in the United States and Canada. The Company believes that the brand building, retail marketing and product development knowledge and skills of the Company’s management team and employees possess will be essential to the Company becoming a respected household name within the retail cannabis industry. Please see Item 1A – “Risk Factors” – “Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Operations and Industry” – “The Company is dependent on suppliers and key inputs for the cultivation, extraction and production of cannabis products.”

Competitive Conditions

The Company currently faces, and will continue to face, competition from new and existing licensed cannabis operators, competitors with existing retail operations, government owned retailers, the illicit market, and other applicable participants in the cannabis wholesale and manufacturing industry. Some of the Company's competitors may have greater financial resources, market access and manufacturing and marketing experience than the Company. Due to challenging market conditions in certain jurisdictions, some operators have exited the industry and in doing so have heavily discounted their products, creating pressure on pricing.

Increased competition from numerous independent cannabis retail outlets, wholesalers and larger and better-financed competitors (including new entrants), and heavily discounted products by exiting players could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In the United States, as each state continues to oversee all regulations and policies within its individual borders, each state has the power to change its guidelines, laws, and regulatory operations at any time. This includes, but is not limited to expanding into adult-use consumption, limiting the number of dispensaries an operator can own and run in a jurisdiction, or regulating partnerships with social equity licenses.

The Company’s competitors can be grouped into the following categories:

Protection of Intellectual Property

The Company believes that the ownership and protection of the Company’s intellectual property rights is a significant aspect of the Company’s future opportunity. Currently the Company relies on trade secrets, technical know-how and proprietary information for its commercial strategy. The Company protects its intellectual property by seeking and obtaining registered protection where possible, developing and implementing standard operating procedures to protect trade secrets, technical know-how and proprietary information and entering into restrictive agreements with parties that have access to the Company’s inventions, trade secrets, technical know-how and proprietary information, such as the Company’s partners, collaborators, employees and consultants, to protect confidentiality and intellectual property rights. The Company also seeks to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of its inventions, trade secrets, trademarks, technical know-how and proprietary information by maintaining strict operating procedures, physical security of the Company’s premises and physical and electronic security of its information technology systems.

In addition, the Company has sought and will continue to seek trademark protection in the United States and Canada. The Company’s ability to obtain registered trademark protection for cannabis-related goods and services, in particular for cannabis itself is limited in the United States, where registered federal trademark protection is currently unavailable for trademarks covering cannabis-related products and services that are illegal under the Controlled Substances Act. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to obtain intellectual property rights or enforce intellectual property rights against third party uses of similar trademarks may be limited in the United States. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office released a policy on May 2, 2019 which clarifies that applications for trademarks for products that meet the definition of hemp could be accepted for registration, subject to certain exceptions.

Privacy and Cybersecurity

In the ordinary course of our business, the Company may process personal or sensitive data. Accordingly, the Company is subject to numerous data privacy and security obligations, including federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, guidance, and industry standards related to data privacy, security, and protection. Such obligations may include, without limitation, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation, and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI-DSS”). Additionally, the Company is, or may become, subject to various U.S. federal and state consumer protection laws which require us to publish statements that accurately and fairly describe how the Company handles personal data and choices individuals may have about the way their personal data was handled.

The regulatory landscape around privacy and cybersecurity is evolving rapidly and becoming increasingly stringent, which may increase our compliance obligations and exposure for any noncompliance. See the section titled “The Company is or may become subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, rules, contractual obligations, policies and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Its actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of the Company's business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; and other adverse business consequences” for additional information about the laws and regulations to which we may become subject and about the risks to our business associated with such laws and regulations.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2023, the Company employed 1,165 employees, 73 of whom were subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Of these employees, approximately 944 were engaged on a full-time basis. The Company believes that it has a good relationship with its employees.

The Company believes in building a diverse team, and it strives to foster a welcoming culture where employees can make an impact on the Company’s success. The Company encourages talented people from all backgrounds to join the Company and dedicated to promoting inclusion by encouraging its employees to participate in employee resource groups and other diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

The Company is committed to providing a safe and secure work environment in accordance with applicable labor, safety, health, anti-discrimination and other workplace laws. The Company strives for all employees to feel safe and empowered at work. To that end, The Company maintains a hotline that employees can call, with the option of remaining anonymous, to voice concerns.

Licenses and Regulatory Framework in United States

Summary of U.S. Cannabis Regulatory Regime

The cannabis industry is subject to various state and local laws, regulations and guidelines relating to the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale, storage and disposal of medical and adult-use cannabis, as well as laws and regulations relating to health and safety, the conduct of operations and the protection of the environment. The U.S. regulatory scheme varies in its terminology and definitions, using “cannabis”, “marijuana,” “marihuana,” and “hemp” as distinct terms. The regulatory environment governing the medical and adult-use cannabis industries in the United States, where state law permits such activities, are, and will continue to be, subject to evolving regulation by governmental authorities. Accordingly, there are a number of risks associated with investing in businesses in an evolving regulatory environment, including, without limitation, increased number of permits or licenses being issued and increased regulatory burden on operators.

The U.S. federal government classifies cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Cannabis and/or cannabis products having more than 0.3% concentration of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, is cannabis. Conversely, cannabis with a THC concentration of less than 0.3% is classified as hemp.

There are 38 states plus the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, United States, Virgin Islands and Guam have legalized medical cannabis and approximately 24 states plus the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Commonwealth of Northern Marina Islands have legalized adult-use cannabis. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical, and in some cases also adult-use cannabis at the state level, cannabis remains a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, making it illegal under U.S. federal law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell or possess cannabis in the United States. Furthermore, financial transactions involving proceeds generated by, or intended to promote, cannabis-related business activities in the United States may form the basis for prosecution under applicable federal money laundering legislation.

The U.S. federal government’s approach to enforcement of cannabis laws has trended toward deferring to state laws where a robust state regulatory framework exists. On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued a memorandum known as the “Cole Memorandum” to all U.S. Attorneys’ offices. The Cole Memorandum generally directed U.S. Attorneys not to prioritize the enforcement of federal cannabis laws against individuals and businesses that comply with state medical cannabis programs. The Cole Memorandum, while not legally binding and only a policy statement, assisted in managing the tension between state and federal laws concerning all medical and adult-use state-regulated cannabis businesses.

On January 4, 2018, the Cole Memorandum was rescinded by former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. While this did not create a change in federal law, the revocation added to the uncertainty of U.S. federal enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act in states where cannabis use is regulated. Former Attorney General Sessions also issued a one-page memorandum known as the “Sessions Memorandum” which confirmed the rescission of the Cole Memorandum and explained that the Cole Memorandum was “unnecessary” due to existing general enforcement guidance as set forth in the U.S. Attorney’s Manual. The Sessions Memorandum did not otherwise indicate that the prosecution of cannabis-related offenses is a heightened DOJ priority. Furthermore, the Sessions Memorandum explicitly describes itself as a guide to prosecutorial discretion. Such prosecutorial discretion remains in the hands of U.S. Attorneys when deciding whether or not to prosecute cannabis-related offenses.

On November 7, 2018, U.S. Attorney General Sessions resigned as U.S. Attorney General. On February 14, 2019, William Barr was confirmed by the U.S. Senate (the "Senate") as the next U.S. Attorney General. During one of his Senate confirmation hearings, Mr. Barr stated that he did not support cannabis legalization but would not prosecute cannabis businesses that comply with state laws. Mr. Barr stated further that he would not upset settled expectations that have arisen as a result of the Cole Memorandum.

On March 11, 2021, Merrick Garland was appointed U.S. Attorney General and indicated he would generally act in accordance with the Cole Memorandum, when, at his confirmation hearing, he said, “It does not seem to me a useful use of limited resources that we have, to be pursuing prosecutions in states that have legalized and that are regulating the use of cannabis, either medically or otherwise.” U.S. Attorney General. Mr. Garland has not, however, reissued the Cole Memorandum or issued substitute guidance.

On October 6, 2022, President Joseph Biden requested that the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the U.S. Attorney General initiate a review as to how cannabis is currently scheduled under federal law. In December 2022, President Biden signed the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion Act into law, which allows for significantly broader opportunities to study cannabis. On August 29, 2023, following a review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Secretary of HHS issued a recommendation to the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) that cannabis be moved from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. In December 2023, the DEA confirmed it is in the process of conducting its review of HHS’s recommendation.

Despite it’s recension, as an industry best practice, the Company abides by the following policies to ensure compliance with the guidance included in the Cole Memorandum:

• The Company’s operations comply with all licensing requirements as required by the state, county, municipality, or other administrative divisions and the Company continuously monitors its operations to ensure compliance of such operations;

• The Company has implemented compliant policies and procedures to prevent the distribution of cannabis products to minors;

• The Company has implemented an inventory tracking system and other compliant procedures to track inventory and prevent the diversion of cannabis products in compliance with each jurisdiction’s requirements;

• The Company’s operations adhere to the scope of the regulations governing the cannabis license in the market in which the Company operates;

• The Company has implemented compliant policies and procedures to prevent the distribution of the proceeds from its operations to criminal enterprises, cartels, or gangs;

• The Company has implemented compliant quality controls to ensure all products comply with applicable regulations and contain the necessary disclaimers and warnings associated with the contents of the products to avoid adverse public health consequences; and

• The Company has implemented compliant policies and procedures to effectively monitor its state-authorized operations so that it is not used as a cover or pretense for the trafficking of illegal drugs or engaging in other illegal activity.

For the reasons set forth herein, the Company’s existing investments in the United States, and any future investments, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in the United States or Canada. As a result, the Company may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightened scrutiny will not lead to the imposition of certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to invest in the United States or any other jurisdiction. Government policy changes or public opinion may also result in a significant influence over the regulation of the cannabis industry in the United States or elsewhere. Among other things, such a shift could cause state and local jurisdictions to abandon initiatives or proposals to legalize medical or adult-use cannabis, thereby limiting the number of new state jurisdictions into which the Company could expand. Any inability to fully implement the Company’s expansion strategy may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, under U.S. federal law, it may be a violation for financial institutions to take any proceeds from the sale of cannabis or any other Schedule I controlled substance. Banks and other financial institutions, particularly those that are federally chartered in the United States, could be prosecuted and possibly convicted of money laundering for providing services to

cannabis businesses. It may also be a violation of federal money laundering statutes for “federal health care law violations,” which include violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”).

Violations of any U.S. federal laws and regulations could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but not limited to, disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities, civil forfeiture or divestiture. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including its reputation and ability to conduct business, its cannabis licenses in the United States, the listing of its securities on various stock exchanges, its financial position, operating results, profitability or liquidity or the market price of its publicly traded shares. In addition, it is difficult for the Company to estimate the time or resources that would be needed for the investigation of any such matters or its final resolution because, in part, the time and resources that may be needed are dependent on the nature and extent of any information requested by the applicable authorities involved, and such time or resources could be substantial. For the reasons set forth above, the Company’s investments and operations in the United States may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada.

The Company may also be subject to a variety of laws and regulations domestically and in the United States that relate to money laundering, financial recordkeeping and proceeds of crime, including the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (commonly known as the "Bank Secrecy Act"), as amended by Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), as amended and the rules and regulations thereunder, the Criminal Code (Canada) and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued, administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the United States and Canada.

In February 2014, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department issued a memorandum (the “FinCEN Memorandum”) providing instructions to banks seeking to provide services to cannabis-related businesses. The FinCEN Memorandum clarifies how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with their Bank Secrecy Act obligations. It refers to supplementary guidance that Deputy Attorney General Cole issued to federal prosecutors relating to the prosecution of money laundering offenses predicated on cannabis-related violations of the Controlled Substances Act and independently lists the federal government’s enforcement priorities as related to cannabis. Although the original FinCEN Memorandum is still in place, this supplementary DOJ guidance that accompanied the FinCEN Memorandum was rescinded when former Attorney General Sessions rescinded the Cole Memorandum. It is unclear whether the current administration will follow the guidelines of the FinCEN Memorandum, although immediately after the Sessions Memorandum, then-U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin stated that the Treasury Department had no intention to rescind the FinCEN Memorandum but, instead, wanted to improve the availability of banking services in the state-regulated cannabis space.

H.R. 1595, or "the SAFE Banking Act" of 2019, which would expand financial services in the United States. to cannabis-related legitimate businesses and service providers, was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House”) on March 7, 2019 with bipartisan support. The Safe Banking Act has passed the House six times but has yet to pass the Senate. A new version of the SAFE Banking Act known as the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation ("SAFER Banking Act") was introduced in the Senate on September 21, 2023, and subsequently approved by the Senate Committee on Banking. The SAFER Banking Act is now pending passage in the U.S. Senate and, if passed, will move on to the House where it faces an uncertain future.

Other legislation that has been introduced in the United States that would make cannabis transactions easier and more predictable, include the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act (the “MORE Act”) and the Cannabis Administration and Opportunities Act (the “CAOA”). The MORE Act was first introduced in July 2019 by Representative Jerrold Nadler in the House, and in the Senate by then-U.S. Senator Kamala Harris. If it were to become law, the MORE Act would remove cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act and make available U.S. Small Business Administration funding for regulated cannabis operators. The MORE Act was reintroduced in the current U.S. Congress (“Congress”) by Representative Nadler on May 28, 2021, with no corresponding bill introduced in the Senate. The CAOA was released as a discussion draft by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, and U.S. Senator Cory Booker in July 2021. If it were to become law it would, among other things, remove cannabis from the definition of a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, allow states to set their own regulations for cannabis, and block states from prohibiting interstate commerce of regulated cannabis across their borders. Recently introduced into Congress is another bill, the States Reform Act, introduced by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), which would repeal the federal prohibition of cannabis.

Despite the rescission of the Cole Memorandum, Congress has passed appropriations bills in each fiscal year since FY2015, that prevents the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. The continuing resolution contains, among

other things, a rider known as Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment (the "RBA"), which prevents the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state medical laws. However, this measure does not protect adult-use cannabis businesses. The U.S. Ninth Circuit in United States v. McIntosh held that the prohibition under the RBA also prevents the DOJ from spending federal funds to prosecute individuals who are engaged in conduct that is permitted by, and in compliance with, state medical cannabis laws.

On October 6, 2022, President Joseph Biden requested that the Secretary of HHS and the Attorney General to initiate a review as to how cannabis is currently scheduled under federal law. In August 2023, following a review by the FDA, the Secretary of HHS issued a recommendation to the DEA that cannabis be moved to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. In December 2023, the DEA confirmed it is currently conducting its review.

State-Level Overview

The following section presents an overview of market and regulatory conditions for the cannabis industry in the United States that the Company has or is intending to have an operating presence and is presented as of the date of filing, unless otherwise indicated.

California

In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, also known as the Compassionate Use Act, allowing physicians to recommend cannabis for an inclusive set of qualifying medical conditions. The law established a not-for-profit patient/caregiver system but there was no state licensing authority to oversee the businesses that emerged. In September of 2015, the California legislature passed three bills, collectively known as the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. In 2016, California voters passed The Adult Use of Marijuana Act, which legalized recreational use cannabis for adults 21 years of age and older and created a licensing system for commercial cannabis businesses. On June 27, 2017, then-Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 94 into law, which combined California’s medicinal and recreational use cannabis frameworks into one licensing structure under the Medicinal and Adult-Use of Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA”).

Pursuant to MAUCRSA: (i) CalCannabis, a division of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, was designated to issue licenses to cannabis cultivators: (ii) the Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch (the “MCSB”), a division of the California Department of Public Health, was designated to issue licenses to cannabis manufacturers; and (iii) the California Department of Consumer Affairs, via its agency the Bureau of Cannabis Control (the “BCC”), was designated to issue licenses to cannabis distributors, testing laboratories, retailers, and micro-businesses. These agencies were also charged with overseeing various aspects of implementing and maintaining California’s cannabis landscape, including the statewide track and trace system. All three agencies released their initial emergency rulemakings at the end of 2017 and updated them with minor revisions in June 2018. The three agencies adopted their permanent rulemakings on January 16, 2019. All three agencies began issuing temporary licenses in January 2018 and stopped doing so on December 31, 2018, pursuant to MAUCRSA.

Local authorization is a prerequisite to obtaining a state license, and local governments are permitted to prohibit or otherwise regulate the types and number of cannabis businesses allowed in their locality. All three state regulatory agencies require confirmation from the applicable locality that the operator is operating in compliance with local requirements and was granted authorization to continue or commence commercial cannabis operations within the locality’s jurisdiction. Applicants are required to comply with all local zoning and land use requirements and provide written authorization from the property owner where the commercial cannabis operations are proposed to take place, which must dictate that the applicant has the property owner’s authorization to engage in the specific state-sanctioned commercial cannabis activities proposed to occur on the premises. The State has not set a limit on the number of state licenses an entity may hold, unlike other states that have restricted how many cannabis licenses an entity may hold in total or for various types of cannabis activity. Although vertical integration across multiple license types is allowed under MAUCRSA, testing laboratory licensees may not hold any other licenses aside from a laboratory license. There are also no residency requirements for ownership of a state license under MAUCRSA.

California state licenses, and some local licenses, are renewed annually. Each year, licensees are required to submit a state renewal application to the relevant regulatory authority, and all applicable local renewal applications to the applicable local regulatory body (for local licenses).

On July 12, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB-141 into law, triggering the consolidation of CalCannabis, the MCSB, and the BCC into the newly created Department of Cannabis Control (the “DCC”). The DCC was created in an effort to centralize regulatory authority and facilitate a more easily navigable regulatory regime. All licenses obtained under the previous regulatory authorities automatically transferred to the DCC, which is now responsible for issuing and renewing all cannabis licenses. In September 2021 the DCC issued emergency regulations, which were approved and went into effect the same month.

The emergency regulations, among other things, include revised definitions clarifying who are considered to be owners or holders of a financial stake in cannabis businesses, and provisions allowing for the sale of branded products between businesses.

California’s robust regulatory system is designed to ensure, monitor, and enforce compliance with all aspects of a cannabis operator’s licensed operations. California’s state license application process additionally requires comprehensive criminal, regulatory, financial and personal disclosures, coupled with stringent monitoring and continuous reporting requirements designed to ensure only good actors are granted licenses and that licensees continue to operate in compliance with the state regulatory program. Applicants must submit standard operating procedures describing how the operator will, among other requirements, secure the facility, manage inventory, comply with the state’s seed-to-sale tracking requirements, dispense cannabis, and handle waste, as applicable to the license sought. Once licensed, an operator must continue to abide by the processes described in its application and seek regulatory approval before any changes to such procedures can be made. Licensees are additionally required to train their employees on compliant operations and are only permitted to transact with other legal and licensed businesses.

As a condition of state licensure, operators must consent to random and unannounced inspections of their commercial cannabis facility as well as the facility’s books and records, so as to monitor and enforce compliance with state law. Many localities have also enacted similar standards for inspections, and the state has already commenced site-visits and compliance inspections for operators who have received state temporary or annual licensure.

New Jersey

On January 18, 2010, the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act (the “CUMMA”) came into force allowing patients with a limited number of qualifying medial conditions to access the state’s medical marijuana program. The New Jersey Department of Health (the “NJDOH”) issued regulations shortly thereafter authorizing the NJDOH to accept applications for a minimum of six alternative treatment centers (the “ATCs”), with two each to operate in the north, central and south regions of New Jersey.

CUMMA permits each ATC to operate as both a cultivator and dispensary under one permit. These activities can take place at up to two locations, as long as both locations are within the same region. The application process involves two stages. Those seeking an ATC permit must first submit an application seeking authority to apply for a permit to operate. Upon the granting of the application, the prospective ATC must then complete the application for actual permitting. Applications for authority to apply for a permit may only be submitted following solicitation from NJDOH for such applications. The first six permits for ATCs were awarded to nonprofit entities, with subsequent permits to be available to both nonprofit and for-profit entities. In 2013, CUMMA was amended to allow ATCs to cultivate an unlimited number of strains of cannabis and sell additional cannabis-infused products, and to restrict the same of cannabis-infused edible products to qualifying patients under the age of 18. With additional authorizations, ATCs may also house manufacturing facilities for cannabis-infused products such as syrups and lozenges. All cannabis is subject to a tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) limit of 10%, though NJDOH is proposing to repeal the regulation that establishes this limit.

Upon taking office on January 16, 2018, Governor Murphy expanded the medical program by issuing Executive Order No. 6, which ordered a 60-day review of all aspects of New Jersey’s current program, “with a focus on ways to expand access to cannabis for medical purposes.” In response to Executive Order No. 6, NJDOH released its EO 6 Report on March 23, 2018, which proposed significant changes to the existing medicinal program. In an effort to create greater patient access, the state immediately put into effect some of the recommended changes, including cutting registration and renewal fees, and expanding qualifying conditions.

On July 16, 2018, the Murphy Administration announced that the licensing application process would be opened for up to six additional vertically integrated medicinal cannabis ATCs. The NJDOH released a Notice of Request for Applications outlining the reason for issuing the licenses, eligibility rules and information required for the applications. The application period opened on August 1, 2018 and closed on August 31, 2018. Winning applicants were supposed to be selected on or before November 1, 2018 but this deadline was subsequently pushed to December due to administrative constraints. On December 17, 2018, NJDOH revealed the additional six medical cannabis ATCs it picked to add to the program. New Jersey will now have 12 vertically-integrated ATCs across the state, if these additional six applicant ATCs become operational. These six applicant ATCs now must pass background checks, provide evidence of cultivation and dispensary locations with municipal approval for each location, and comply with all regulations promulgated by the NJDOH, including safety and security requirements.

On March 25, 2019, a planned vote on legislative package including medical expansion and adult-use legalization was pulled due to a lack of votes necessary to pass the legislation through the state Senate. This setback came after significant momentum had helped to pass the bill through the appropriations and judiciary committees earlier in the month. After the package of cannabis reforms stalled, Governor Murphy announced he would be expanding the medical program through administrative action. On December 18, 2020, Governor Murphy signed A. 5981/S. 4154 into law, which facilitated the expungement of

low-level cannabis crimes and other offenses. On November 3, 2020, New Jersey voters passed a ballot measure amending the New Jersey Constitution to permit the use of cannabis for adults over 21 years of age. The ballot measure allowed New Jersey to regulate the growth, distribution, and sale of adult-use cannabis.

On February 22, 2021, Governor Murphy signed the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act into law, legalizing the use of cannabis by adults 21 years of age and older in New Jersey. On August 19, 2021, New Jersey’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission (“CRC”) published its first set of rules for adult-use cannabis in the state. These rules outline the details of licensing, the authority of municipalities, the operations of cannabis businesses, and the CRC’s authority over adult-use cannabis. Adult-use sales in New Jersey commenced on April 21, 2022.

In September 2023, pursuant to Resolutions 2023-143 and 2023-144, the CRC waived N.J.A.C 17:30A-10.7(e), N.J.A.C 17:30-11.5(c)(3) and N.J.A.C 17:30-11.6(b) to allow the manufacturing and dispensing of additional ingestible products as an authorized form in the medical and adult-use cannabis industries.

Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania medical cannabis program was signed into law on April 17, 2016, under Act 16 and provided access to state residents with one or more of 17 qualifying conditions, including: epilepsy, chronic pain, and PTSD. The state originally awarded only 12 licenses to cultivate/process and 27 licenses to operate retail dispensaries (which entitled holders to up to three medical dispensary locations per retail license).

On March 22, 2018, it was announced that the final phase of the Pennsylvania medical cannabis program would initiate its rollout, which included 13 additional cultivation/processing licenses and 23 additional dispensary licenses. Additionally, the list of qualifying conditions was expanded from 17 to 21. On July 20, 2019, two more qualifying medical conditions were added, bringing the total to 23.

There are two principal license categories in Pennsylvania: (1) cultivation/processing and (2) dispensary. All cultivation/processing establishments and dispensaries must register with Pennsylvania Department of Health. Registration certificates are valid for a period of one year and are subject to annual renewals after required fees are paid and the business remains in good standing. The Pennsylvania Department of Health must renew a permit unless it determines the applicant is unlikely to maintain effective control against diversion of medical cannabis and the applicant is unlikely to comply with all laws as prescribed under the Pennsylvania medical cannabis program.

Under applicable laws, the licenses permit the license holder to cultivate, manufacture, process, package, sell and purchase medical cannabis pursuant to the terms of the licenses, which are issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Health under the provisions of Medical Marijuana Act and Pennsylvania regulations. The medical cultivation/processing licenses permit the licensee to acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture/process into medical cannabis products and/or medical cannabis-infused products, deliver, transfer, have tested, transport, supply or sell cannabis and related supplies to medical cannabis dispensaries.

The retail dispensary licenses permit the Company to purchase cannabis and cannabis products from cultivation/processing facilities, as well as allow the sale of cannabis and cannabis products.

Maryland

The Maryland medical cannabis program was signed into law on May 2, 2013. In 2016, the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission issued preliminary licenses to 102 dispensaries, 15 cultivators, and 15 processors; the first dispensaries opened to patients in December 2017.

Maryland has three classes of cannabis licenses: dispensaries, cultivators, and processors. Wholesaling occurs between cultivators and processors, cultivators and dispensaries, and processors and dispensaries. Originally, no one company could directly control multiple licenses of the same class, but this restriction was changed in May 2019 when Governor Hogan signed a bill that permitted a single company to own or control, including the power to manage or operate, up to four dispensaries. Dispensary locations are tied to the Senate District in which they were awarded, with the exception of applicants who were awarded dispensary and cultivation licenses. These dispensaries can be located at the discretion of the license holder. Permitted products include oil-based formulations, flower, and edibles.

In April 2018, the Maryland House and Senate approved a bill, which was later signed by Governor Hogan, that expanded the license pool, allowing for a maximum of seven additional cultivation licenses, for a total of 22, and 13 additional processing licenses, for a total of 28. In November 2022, the voters in Maryland approved adult-use cannabis as a ballot question.

Beginning on July 1, 2023, adults 21 or older may possess and consume up to 1.5 ounces of cannabis flower, 12 grams of concentrated cannabis, or a total amount of cannabis products that does not exceed 750 mg THC. This amount is known as the "personal use amount." Adult-use sales are expected to begin around the same time. Subsequently, in July 2023, the Maryland Cannabis Administration (the "MCA") was established to oversee both Maryland's medical and adult-use cannabis programs. As of July 1, 2023, all medical license holders that chose to convert their licenses and whose conversion applications the MCA approved became the holders of "hybrid" medical and adult-use licenses (i.e., each license issued by the MCA permits the cultivation, processing, and dispensing of both medical and adult-use cannabis).

Michigan

In November 2008, Michigan residents approved the Michigan Compassionate Care Initiative to provide a legal framework for individuals with certain debilitating medical conditions to lawfully use cannabis for medicinal purposes. In September 2016, the Michigan Legislature passed, and Governor Snyder signed into law, the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act (the “MMFLA”) and the Marihuana Tracking Act (the “MTA”) to provide a comprehensive licensing and tracking scheme, respectively, for state’s medical cannabis program.

In 2018, Michigan voters approved Proposal 1, to make cannabis legal under state and local law for adults 21 years of age or older and to control the commercial production and distribution of cannabis under a system that licenses, regulates, and taxes the businesses involved. The proposal is known as the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (the “MRTMA” and together with the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act, the MMFLA, and the MTA, the “Michigan Cannabis Laws”).

Additionally, the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (“LARA”) and the Marijuana Regulatory Agency ("MRA") have supplemented the Michigan Cannabis Laws with administrative rules and bulletins to further clarify the regulatory landscape surrounding the state’s medical and adult-use cannabis programs. The MRA is the main regulatory authority for the licensing and regulation of medical and adult-use cannabis businesses and is an agency within LARA.

Under the MMFLA, the MRA administrates five types of “state operating licenses” for medical cannabis businesses: (a) a “grower” license, including three different classes of licenses: (i) a Class A license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 500 plants; (ii) a Class B license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 1,000 plants; and (iii) a Class C license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 1,500 plants, (b) a “processor” license, (c) a “secure transporter” license, (d) a “provisioning center” license and (e) a “safety compliance facility” license. Likewise, under the MRTMA, the MRA administers six types of “state licenses” for adult-use cannabis business: (a) a “marihuana grower” license, including three different classes of licenses: (i) a Class A license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 100 plants; (ii) a Class B license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 500 plants; and (iii) a Class C license that allows the licensee to cultivate up to 2,000 plants, (b) a “marihuana processor” license, (c) a “secure transporter” license, (d) a “marihuana retailer” license, (e) a “marihuana safety compliance facility” license, and (f) a “marihuana microbusiness” license. However, MRTMA also allows the MRA to create additional license types through the administrative rulemaking process. To date, the MRA has created four additional license types: (a) a “designated consumption establishment” license, (b) an “excess marihuana grower” license, (c) a “marihuana event organizer” license, and (d) a “temporary marihuana event” license. Importantly, each excess marihuana grower license allows an entity that holds five adult-use Class C grower licenses issued under MRTMA and at least two medical Class C grower licenses issued under the MMFLA to grow an additional 2,000 plants.

Under both MRTMA and the MMFLA, there are no stated limits on the number of licenses that can be made available on a state level; however, the MRA has discretion over the approval of applications and municipalities can pass additional restrictions, including limiting the number and type of licenses that can be issued within their jurisdiction. Additionally, a person or entity cannot possess or own both a grower/process/provisioning center and a secure transporter license or a safety compliance lab.

On February 11, 2022, Governor Whitmer signed an Executive Reorganization Order 2022-1 which modified the MRA to be called the Cannabis Regulatory Agency ("CRA"). This allowed for the CRA to have authority over Michigan's hemp processors and handlers under the Industrial Hemp Research and Development Act also shifting to the new CRA.

U.S. Hemp Regime

The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (commonly known as the “2018 Farm Bill”) was signed into law on December 20, 2018. The 2018 Farm Bill, among other things, removed “hemp” (including any part of the cannabis plant containing 0.3% THC or less), its extracts, derivatives, and cannabinoids from the Controlled Substances Act definition of “marihuana”, and allows for federally sanctioned hemp production under the purview of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), in coordination with state departments of agriculture that elect to have primary regulatory authority. States and Tribal governments can adopt their own regulatory plans, even if more restrictive than federal regulations, so long as the plans meet minimum

federal standards and are approved by the USDA. Hemp production in jurisdictions that do not choose to submit their own plans (and that do not otherwise prohibit hemp production) will be governed by USDA regulation. “Hemp” as defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, “means the plant Cannabis sativa L., and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not with a THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis.”

While the 2018 Farm Bill removes hemp and hemp-derived products from the controlled substances list under the Controlled Substances Act, it does not legalize cannabidiol (“CBD”) in every circumstance. While not independently scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act, CBD, depending on the source from which it was derived and its THC concentration, can still be classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act’s definition of “marihuana.” Further, although the 2018 Farm Bill creates a limited exception to this prohibition, this exception only applies if the CBD is derived from “hemp” as defined in federal law. Federal law also requires that: (i) the hemp is produced by a Licensed Producer; and (ii) in a manner consistent with the applicable federal and state regulations. CBD and other cannabinoids produced from marihuana as defined by the Controlled Substances Act remain an illegal Schedule I substance under federal law. In addition, many state laws include all CBD within definitions of cannabis and some states have policies or laws that otherwise prohibit or restrict CBD sales.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the 2018 Farm Bill expressly preserves the FDA’s authority to regulate certain products under the FDCA and Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act. The FDA takes the position that because CBD was the subject of substantial clinical investigations that have been made public and is the active ingredient in an FDA-approved drug (Epidiolex), it is therefore illegal to add to food and CBD products are excluded from the dietary supplement definition. While there is an exception for articles that were marketed as a conventional food or dietary supplement before the new drug investigations were authorized (or the new drug was approved), the FDA has asserted that, based on available evidence, the exception does not apply to CBD. As previously mentioned, the FDA takes the position that it is unlawful under the FDCA to introduce food containing added CBD into interstate commerce, or to market CBD products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived. Despite FDA’s stated position, the agency has not, to date, been active in its CBD-related enforcement absent CBD products bearing aggressive therapeutic claims (e.g., claims of treatment of COVID-19, neuropathy, AIDS, diabetes, cancer, etc.). FDA could change its enforcement priorities at any time. The FDA has indicated that it will work towards providing ways for companies to seek approval from the FDA to market CBD products. In addition, options remain available for the FDA to consider whether there are circumstances in which certain cannabis-derived compounds might be permitted in a food or dietary supplement. Importantly, notwithstanding the FDA’s stated position prohibiting sales of CBD containing-foods and dietary supplements, the FDA has authority to issue a regulation allowing the use of a pharmaceutical ingredient, such as CBD, in a food or dietary supplement, even if such pharmaceutical ingredient was not previously marketed as a food or dietary ingredient prior to the initiation of clinical drug trials. Timing regarding if or when FDA might issue such a regulation is unclear.

States have also taken various approaches to the production and sale of hemp-derived food products. Many states have adopted the Uniform State Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which was created in 1984 by the Association of Food and Drug Officials (the “AFDO”), the primary organization for state food and drug officials. The AFDO’s model Uniform Act includes a provision to automatically incorporate changes to the FDCA into state law. However, there is some variation between state Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Acts both because not all states have adopted this provision, and because not all states have adopted the Uniform Act. States that have adopted the Uniform Act generally prohibit the use of CBD in food and dietary supplements due to the FDA’s lack of approval for such uses of the substance, discussed above. For example, Michigan (among other states) prohibits the use of CBD in retail food and beverage products because of the FDA’s stated position. Like FDA, some states, despite having stated positions of the impermissibility of CBD foods and supplements, or any CBD products at all, enforcement is inconsistent, with some state regulators more active than others. Again, these enforcement priorities could change at any time.

Although hemp-derived CBD cannot be added or marketed in foods or dietary supplements, certain hemp derived substances, such as hemp seed oil, may be permissible in food, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and other products depending on whether the ingredients and finished products comply with the other requirements of the FDCA. For example, a substance that will be added to food is subject to premarket approval by the FDA unless it is generally recognized, among qualified experts, to be safe under the conditions of its intended use (“GRAS”). Pursuant to the FDCA, a food ingredient may be marketed in the United States under any of the following three alternative criteria: (i) if it was approved by the FDA or USDA between 1938 and 1958 for the intended use (commonly referred to as a “prior sanction”); (ii) if it is GRAS for its intended use; or (iii) pursuant to a food additive regulation promulgated by the FDA. On December 20, 2018, the FDA issued GRAS approvals for three ingredients that are derived from parts of the cannabis plant that do not contain THC or CBD – hulled hemp seeds, hemp seed protein, and hemp seed oil. These three types of products can be legally marketed in human foods without food additive approval, provided they comply with all other requirements and do not make unlawful drug claims. It is worth noting that none of these GRAS products contain CBD.

The 2018 Farm Bill also contemplates a significant state presence in the regulation of hemp production, as the 2018 Farm Bill empowers states, U.S. territories and Native American tribes to regulate the production and sale of hemp within their respective borders. To regulate commercial hemp production, states, U.S. territories and Native American tribes must submit plans to the USDA setting out the processes associated with how the state, territory or tribe will regulate hemp production, including how it will gather information, test, inspect and dispose of hemp and its related byproducts. The Secretary of the USDA must approve or reject these plans within sixty days of receipt. If a state, territory or tribe chooses not to submit a plan to the USDA, potential producers will be able to apply directly to the USDA for licensing approval. States, territories and tribes may also enact stricter laws than those enacted at the federal level and may ban hemp production and sale within their respective jurisdiction.

Once implemented, in jurisdictions with USDA-approved state programs, it will be a violation of state law to cultivate hemp without a registration in compliance with state law, or in the case of a state or territory without a USDA-approved program, it will be a violation of federal law to cultivate hemp without a federally issued license.

The 2018 Farm Bill was signed into law on December 20, 2018. Importantly, however, the Industrial Hemp cultivation and research provisions contained in the Section 7606 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the “2014 Farm Bill”) will remain in effect pending the USDA’s rulemaking process and certain provisions of the law may not yet be effective. The federal rulemaking process may take more than one year to finalize, and the 2014 Farm Bill will be repealed one year after the USDA establishes regulations governing hemp production in states lacking their own USDA-approved plans. The scope of the 2014 Farm Bill is limited to cultivation that is: (i) for research purposes (inclusive of market research, which multiple federal agencies have confirmed includes commercial sales with a research purpose); (ii) part of an “agricultural pilot program” or other agricultural or academic research; and (iii) permitted by state law. Further, the 2014 Farm Bill defines “Industrial Hemp” as the plant Cannabis sativa L., and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis. The USDA published its final rule on January 19, 2021. The USDA’s final rule establishes a federal licensing plan for regulating U.S. hemp producers in states that do not have their own USDA-approved plans. In the absence of a state plan, U.S. hemp producers will be subject to regulation directly by the USDA unless the state prohibits U.S. hemp production. Additionally, the final rule includes requirements for maintaining information on the land where US hemp is produced, testing U.S. hemp for THC levels, disposing of plants with more than 0.3 percent THC on a dry-weight basis and licensing for U.S. hemp producers. The USDA’s final rule requires hemp producers to use a laboratory that is registered with the DEA, although the USDA is delaying enforcement of this requirement until December 31, 2022. The final rule also includes provisions for producers to dispose or remediate violative hemp plants without the use of a DEA-registered reverse distributor or law enforcement.

In November 2023, President Joseph Biden signed a stopgap funding bill that Congress passed with bipartisan support. The new law extended the 2018 Farm Bill to September 30, 2024, which had previously expired on September 30, 2023. This will allow time for Congress to draft a new Hemp Farm bill.

Regulatory Framework in Canada

Licenses and Regulatory Framework in Canada

The Cookies Canada License

The Company operates the Cookies Canada retail dispensary in Ontario, Canada through TerrAscend Canada, which holds a retail operator's license under the Cannabis License Act (Ontario). The retail operator's license permits, subject to further requirements set out in the legislation, TerrAscend Canada to possess and sell cannabis, including sales of cannabis extracts, topicals and edibles, and oils, in accordance with the applicable legislation and the regulations promulgated thereunder, subject to certain terms and conditions, subject to certain restrictions on age and time of sale.

The TerrAscend Canada Licensed Producer License

TerrAscend Canada held a standard cultivation license, standard processing license and license for sale for medical purposes under the Cannabis Act until February 9, 2023 when it opted to return its license.

Summary of Canadian Regulatory Framework

On October 17, 2018, the Cannabis Act and the Cannabis Regulations (the "Cannabis Regulations") came into force as law with the effect of legalizing the recreational adult-use of cannabis and regulating the production, distribution and sale of cannabis and cannabis derived products (both medical and adult-use) within Canada. The Cannabis Act replaced Controlled Drug and Substances Act (Canada) (the “CDSA”). Under the CDSA, the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations

(the “ACMPR”) set out a framework to provide individuals with access to cannabis for medical purposes and was the governing legislation in respect of the production, sale and distribution of medical cannabis and related oil extracts in Canada. Although ACMPR was repealed, the regulatory framework applicable to cannabis for medical purposes was substantially reproduced within the Cannabis Act with minimal changes.

The Cannabis Regulations provide a licensing and permitting scheme for activities related to cannabis setting out the following classes of licenses that authorize activities in relation to cannabis: (i) a license for cultivation; (ii) a license for processing; (iii) a license for analytical testing; (iv) a license for sale for medical purposes; (v) a license for research; and (vi) a cannabis drug license. Each license contemplates permitting the sale of cannabis within the supply chain (i.e. to other appropriate license holders or those permitted under a provincial law) but does not include the ability to sell recreational cannabis to retail consumers which is regulated by the provinces. At the end of each term of their respective licenses, a license holder must submit an application for renewal to Health Canada containing information prescribed by the Cannabis Act.

The Cannabis Regulations, among other things, outline the rules for the legal cultivation, processing, research, testing, distribution, sale, importation and exportation of cannabis and hemp in Canada.

Pursuant to the Cannabis Act, but subject to provincial or territorial restrictions, adults who are over the age of 18 are legally able to: (i) possess up to 30 grams of legal cannabis, dried or equivalent in non-dried form in public; (ii) share up to 30 grams of legal cannabis, dried or equivalent in non-dried form with other adults; (iii) buy dried or fresh cannabis and cannabis oil from a provincially licensed retailer; (iv) grow, from licensed seed or seedlings, up to four cannabis plants per residence for personal use; and (v) make cannabis products, such as food and drinks, at home as long as dangerous organic solvents are not used to create concentrated products.

In the initial stage of the regulated adult-use cannabis market, products available for sale were the same as those permitted in the medical cannabis market (dried flowers, oils and softgels and dried cannabis products). On October 17, 2019, the second phase of adult-use cannabis products, specifically, edible cannabis products, cannabis extracts, and cannabis topical products, were legalized pursuant to certain amendments to the regulations under the Cannabis Act. Edible cannabis products, cannabis extracts, and cannabis topical products, which are now available for sale, are subject to additional regulatory requirements that include supplemental marketing and advertising rules, further restrictions on labelling and packaging, rules relating to ingredients of edible cannabis products and cannabis extracts, limits on THC content, and added production facility requirements.

Further, the current regime for medical cannabis will continue to allow access to cannabis for individuals who have the authorization of their healthcare provider.

Provincial and Territorial Developments

While the Cannabis Act provides for the regulation by the Canadian federal government of, among other things, the commercial cultivation and processing of cannabis and the sale of medical cannabis, it also provides that the provinces and territories of Canada have authority to regulate certain aspects of adult-use cannabis, such as retail and distribution of adult-use cannabis, as well as the ability to alter some of the existing baseline requirements, such as increasing the minimum age for purchase and consumption, restricting places where cannabis can be consumed, and a range of other matters.

The governments of every Canadian province and territory have implemented their regulatory regimes for the distribution and sale of cannabis for adult-use purposes, and as such, regulatory regimes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In each of the provinces and territories, except for Saskatchewan, a provincial distributor is responsible for purchasing cannabis from producers and selling products to its regulated retail distribution channels. Most provinces and territories have announced a minimum age of 19 years old, except for Alberta, where the minimum age is 18, and Québec, where the minimum age is 21. In Ontario, the province in which the Company operates Cookies Canada through TerrAscend Canada, the distribution and sale of recreational cannabis is primarily governed by the Cannabis Control Act, the Cannabis License Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. The Ontario Cannabis Retail Corporation is the wholesale distributor of cannabis and conducts all online sales in Ontario.

With respect to retail sales of cannabis, other than online sales, the provincial and territorial regulations in Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Quebec allow only for government-run cannabis stores, while the provincial and territorial regulations in Ontario, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nunavut, Yukon, Saskatchewan and Manitoba leave the retail sale of cannabis, other than online sales, to the private sector. In British Columbia, Northwest Territories and New Brunswick, provincial and territorial regulations allow for a hybrid model in which both public and private stores can operate. In addition, in Ontario, British Columbia, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Quebec and Yukon, the provincial body is solely responsible for online sales.

Most recently, following extensive engagement with stakeholders, universities, researchers, health authorities, cannabis industry associations, cannabis license holders, provinces, territories and the public, the Canadian federal government announced the following amendments to the Cannabis Act and its regulations:

Broadening the educational qualifications for the Head of Laboratory, a position that is required for an analytical testing license and is responsible for all cannabis testing activities that occur at the licensed site.

Compliance

TerrAscend believes it is in compliance with all applicable laws in the jurisdictions it operates including all state laws, the cannabis licensing framework of Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, California, and Michigan, and all provincial laws and the regulations in Ontario, and at the time of license return at the request of the Company, TerrAscend Canada believed it was in compliance with all applicable federal, provincial and territorial laws and regulations, including the Cannabis Act and the Cannabis Regulations. There are no known current incidences of material non-compliance, citations or notices of violations outstanding which may have an impact on the Company’s licenses, business activities or operations where it operates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, like all businesses, the Company may from time to time experience incidences of non-compliance with applicable rules and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, and such non-compliance may have an impact on the Company’s licenses, business activities or operations. However, the Company takes steps to minimize, disclose and remedy all incidences of non-compliance which may have an impact on the Company’s licenses, business activities or operations where the Company operates. Notwithstanding the fact that various states in the United States have implemented medical cannabis laws or have otherwise legalized the use of cannabis, the use of cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law for any purpose, by way of the Controlled Substances Act.

Available Information

The Company’s website address is www.terrascend.com. Through this website, the Company’s filings with the SEC, including its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to such reports, will be accessible (free of charge) as soon as reasonably practicable after materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, and copies thereof are electronically filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval + ("SEDAR+") in Canada. Information contained on or accessible through the Company's website is not a part of this Annual Report, and the inclusion of the Company's website address in this Annual Report is an inactive textual reference only.

The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following risks should be carefully considered when deciding whether to make an investment in the Company. Some of the following factors are interrelated and, consequently, investors and readers should treat such risk factors as a whole. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones that could affect the Company, and additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company, or that it currently considers not to be material, may also impair the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company and/or the value of its securities. If any of the following risks or other risks occur, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations and/or the value of the Company’s securities. There is no assurance that any risk management steps taken by the Company will avoid future loss due to the occurrence of the risks described below, or other unforeseen risks.

Regulatory and Legal Risks Related to the Company’s Business and the Cannabis Industry

There is a substantial risk of regulatory or political change with respect to cannabis, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its business.

In the United States, the operations of TerrAscend and its subsidiaries are subject to a variety of laws, including, among other things, state and local regulations and guidelines relating to the cultivation, manufacture, management, transportation, distribution, sale, storage and disposal of cannabis. Changes to such laws, regulations and guidelines due to matters beyond the control of the Company may cause adverse effects to the Company’s business, financial condition and result of operations. Local, state and federal laws and regulations governing cannabis for medicinal and adult-use purposes are broad in control and are subject to evolving interpretations, which could require the Company to incur substantial costs associated with bringing the Companyʼs operations into compliance. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt the Companyʼs operations and result in a material adverse effect on its financial performance. It is beyond the Companyʼs scope to predict the nature of any future change to the existing laws, regulations, policies, interpretations or applications, nor can the Company determine what effect such changes, when and if promulgated, could have on the Companyʼs business.

In the United States, the production and sale of cannabis is prohibited according to the Controlled Substances Act. If cannabis is re-classified or there are changes in U.S. controlled substance laws and regulations, such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If cannabis is re-classified as a Schedule II or lower controlled substance, the resulting re-classification would result in the need for approval by FDA and DEA. As a result of such a re-classification, the manufacture, importation, exportation, domestic distribution, storage, sale and use of such products could become subject to a significant degree of regulation by the FDA and DEA. In that case, we may be required to be registered to perform these activities and have the security, control, recordkeeping, reporting and inventory mechanisms required by the DEA to prevent drug loss and diversion. Obtaining the necessary registrations may result in delay of the manufacturing or distribution of our products. The DEA conducts periodic inspections of registered establishments that handle controlled substances. Failure to maintain compliance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The DEA may seek civil penalties, refuse to renew necessary registrations, or initiate proceedings to restrict, suspend or revoke those registrations. In certain circumstances, violations could lead to criminal proceedings.

Furthermore, should the United States federal government legalize cannabis, it is possible that the FDA would seek to regulate it under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938. Additionally, the FDA may issue rules and regulations, including good manufacturing practices related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of medical and adult-use cannabis. Clinical trials may be needed to verify efficacy and safety of medical cannabis products. It is also possible that the FDA would require that facilities where cannabis is grown or manufactured register with the agency and comply with certain federally prescribed regulations. In the event that some or all of these regulations are imposed, the impact on the cannabis industry is uncertain and could include the imposition of new costs, requirements, and prohibitions. If we are unable to comply with the regulations or registration as prescribed by the FDA, it may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

In Canada, the Cannabis Act was established on October 17, 2018 along with various related regulations. The cultivation, processing, distribution and sale of cannabis, among other things, remains subject to extensive regulatory oversight in Canada under the Cannabis Act. It is possible that these statutory requirements, including any new regulations that are subsequently issued, could significantly and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Furthermore, the distribution of adult-use cannabis is the responsibility of the respective provincial and territorial governments. There is no guarantee that provincial and territorial legislation regulating the distribution and sale of cannabis for adult-use purposes will continue according to their current terms, that they will not be materially amended or that such regimes will create the growth opportunities currently anticipated by the Company.

In addition, government policy changes or public opinion may also influence the regulation of the cannabis industry in Canada, the United States or elsewhere. A negative shift in the public’s perception of medical or adult-use cannabis in Canada, the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction could affect future legislation or regulation. Among other things, a shift could cause state and local jurisdictions to abandon initiatives or proposals to legalize medical or adult-use cannabis, thereby limiting the number of new state or provincial jurisdictions into which the Company could expand. Any inability to fully implement the Companyʼs expansion strategy may have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations.

Compliance with regulations regarding cannabis is difficult, because the regulation of cannabis is uncertain and frequently changes. The Company's failure to comply with applicable laws regarding cannabis may adversely affect the Company's business.

Achievement of the Companyʼs business objectives is contingent, in part, upon compliance with regulatory requirements enacted by governmental authorities and obtaining all regulatory approvals, where necessary, for the production and sale of its products. The Company cannot predict the impact of the compliance regime that the applicable regulatory bodies in the United States and Canada are implementing that may affect the business of the Company. Similarly, the Company cannot predict the time required to secure all appropriate regulatory approvals for its products, or the extent of testing and documentation that may be required by governmental authorities. The impact of governmental compliance regimes, any delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain regulatory approvals may significantly delay or impact the development of markets, products and sales initiatives and could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

The Company will incur ongoing costs and obligations related to regulatory compliance. Failure to comply with regulations may result in additional costs for corrective measures, penalties or restrictions on the Companyʼs operations. In addition, changes in regulations, more vigorous enforcement thereof or other unanticipated events could require extensive changes to the Companyʼs operations, result in increased compliance costs or give rise to material liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

The cannabis industry is subject to extensive controls and regulations, which may significantly affect the financial condition of the Company. The marketability of any product may be affected by numerous factors that are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be predicted, such as changes to government regulations, including those relating to taxes and other government levies which may be imposed. Changes in government levies, including taxes, could reduce the Companyʼs earnings and could make future capital investments or the Companyʼs operations uneconomic. The industry is also subject to numerous legal challenges, which may significantly affect the financial condition of market participants and which cannot be reliably predicted.

The Company’s business relies heavily on its ability to obtain and maintain required licenses, and failure to do so may adversely affect its business.

The Companyʼs ability to cultivate, manufacture and sell medicinal and adult-use cannabis in certain U.S. states and Canada is dependent on its ability to maintain licenses with applicable regulators for the cultivation, manufacture, and sale of cannabis. Failure to comply with the requirements of its licenses or any failure to maintain its licenses could have a material adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

The Company and its subsidiaries, as applicable, will apply for, as the need arises, all necessary licenses and permits for the activities it expects to conduct in the future. However, the ability of the Company or its subsidiaries to obtain, maintain or renew any such licenses and permits on acceptable terms is subject to changes in regulations and policies and at the discretion of the applicable authorities or other governmental agencies in each jurisdictions.

In certain jurisdictions, the cannabis laws and regulations limit, not only the number of cannabis licenses issued, but also the number of cannabis licenses that one may own. The Company believes that, where such restrictions apply, it may still capture significant share of revenue in the market through wholesale sales, exclusive marketing relations, provision of management or support services, franchising and similar arrangement with other operators. Nevertheless, limitations on the acquisition of ownership of additional licenses within certain states or enforcement by regulators in certain states against such services arrangements may limit the Companyʼs ability to grow organically or increase its market share in such states.

As a cannabis business, the Company is subject to unfavorable tax treatment under U.S. federal income tax law.

Tax risk is the risk of changes in the tax environment that would have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, results of operations, and financial condition. Currently, U.S. state licensed cannabis businesses are assessed a comparatively high effective U.S. federal income tax rate due to Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), which prohibits businesses associated with trafficking in controlled substances (within the meaning of Schedule I and II of the Controlled Substances Act) from deducting certain expenses. The IRS has invoked Section 280E of the Code in tax audits against various cannabis businesses in the United States that are permitted under applicable U.S. state laws. Although the IRS issued a clarification allowing the deduction of certain expenses, the scope of such items is interpreted very narrowly, and the bulk of operating costs and general administrative costs are not permitted to be deducted. While there are currently several pending cases before various U.S. administrative and federal courts challenging these restrictions, there is no guarantee that these courts will issue an interpretation of Section 280E of the Code favorable to cannabis businesses. Given these facts, the

impact of any such challenges cannot be reliably estimated; however, it may be significant to the financial condition and/or the overall operations of the Company.

The Company is preparing to amend its U.S. federal income tax returns for 2020, 2021, and 2022 based on legal interpretations that challenge its tax liability under 280E of the Code. The Company has taken the position that it does not owe taxes attributable to the application of Section 280E of the Code. If the Company’s tax positions were to be challenged by U.S. federal, state, or local or non-U.S. tax jurisdictions, the Company may not be wholly successful in defending its tax filing positions. The Company records reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on its assessment of the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing positions. Management exercises significant judgment when assessing the probability of successfully sustaining the Company’s tax filing positions, and in determining whether a contingent tax liability should be recorded and, if so, estimating the amount. If the Company’s tax filing positions are successfully challenged, payments could be required that are equal to the reserved amounts which could be significant to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

On October 6, 2022, President Joseph Biden requested that the Secretary of HHS and the Attorney General to initiate a review as to how cannabis is currently scheduled under federal law. In August 2023, following a review by the FDA, the Secretary of HHS issued a recommendation to the DEA that cannabis be moved to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. In December 2023, the DEA confirmed it is currently conducting its review. If cannabis is moved to Schedule III from Schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act, it could end the effect of Section 280E of the Code on some or all of the Company’s operations. However, any such change from Schedule I to Schedule III is beyond the control of the Company and cannot be predicted.

The Company may be at a higher risk of an IRS audit

There may be a greater likelihood that the IRS will audit the tax returns of cannabis-related businesses and any such IRS audit may require significant management attention. Additionally, the Company plans to file refund claims for several of its subsidiaries, which may also increase the likelihood of an audit. Any such audit of the Company’s tax returns could result in it being required to pay additional tax, interest and penalties, as well as incremental accounting and legal expenses, which could be material.

If the Company is or becomes a “passive foreign investment company,” its U.S. investors may suffer adverse tax consequences.

Generally, for any taxable year, if at least 75% of the Company’s gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the value of the Company’s assets (generally determined based on a weighted quarterly average) is attributable to assets that produce, or are held for the production, of passive income, the Company will be a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of these tests, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, certain gains from the sale of investment property, and certain rents and royalties, and passive assets generally include cash. Additionally, the Company generally will be treated as directly holding and receiving its proportionate share of the assets and income, respectively, of any corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, 25% of its stock by value. If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year, certain U.S. investors may suffer adverse tax consequences, including ineligibility for preferential tax rates on capital gains or dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred, and additional tax reporting requirements.

The Company’s PFIC status generally will depend on the nature and composition of the Company’s income and assets and the value of the Company’s assets (which generally will be determined based on the fair market value of each asset, with the value of goodwill determined in large part by reference to the market value of the Company’s stock from time to time, which may be volatile). If the Company’s market capitalization declines while it holds a substantial amount of cash for any taxable year, the Company may be a PFIC for such taxable year. The manner and timeframe in which the Company spends the cash it raises in any offering, the transactions it enters into, and how the Company’s corporate structure may change in the future will affect the nature and composition of the Company’s income and assets. Based on the nature and composition of the Company’s income and assets and the value of the Company’s assets, including goodwill, the Company believes that it was not a PFIC for its taxable year ended December 31, 2023. Because PFIC determination is a factual determination made annually after the end of each taxable year by applying principles and methodologies that in some circumstances are unclear and subject to varying interpretation, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be a PFIC for any taxable year, and the Company’s U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to the Company’s PFIC status for any taxable year. U.S. investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the PFIC rules’ impact in their particular circumstances.

If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year, the tax consequences that would apply if U.S. investors were able to make a valid “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”) election would be different. At this time, the Company does not expect to provide U.S.

investors with the information necessary for them to make a QEF election if the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year. U.S. investors should assume that a QEF election will not be available with respect to the Company’s stock.

If the Company (or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries) is a “controlled foreign corporation,” certain of its U.S. investors may suffer adverse tax consequences.

If a “United States person” for U.S. federal income tax purposes is treated as owning (directly, indirectly, or constructively) at least 10% of the total value or total combined voting power of the Company’s stock, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” (each, a "U.S. Shareholder") with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” (“CFC”) in the Company’s group (if any). A non-U.S. corporation will be a CFC if U.S. Shareholders own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) more than 50% of the total value or total combined voting power of the stock of the non-U.S. corporation. Because the Company’s group includes one or more U.S. corporate subsidiaries, certain of its current or future non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries may be treated as CFCs (regardless of whether the Company is treated as a CFC). A U.S. Shareholder of a CFC may be required to annually report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of the CFC’s “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income,” and investments of earnings in U.S. property (regardless of whether the CFC makes any distributions to its shareholders). Additionally, an individual U.S. Shareholder with respect to a CFC generally will not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a corporate U.S. Shareholder. A failure to comply with CFC reporting obligations may subject a U.S. Shareholder to significant monetary penalties and prevent the statute of limitations from running with respect to the U.S. Shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the taxable year in which reporting was due. There can be no assurance that the Company will assist its U.S. investors in determining whether it (or any of its current or future non-U.S. subsidiaries) is treated as a CFC or whether such U.S. investors are treated as U.S. Shareholders with respect to any such CFC, or that the Company will furnish to any such U.S. Shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with their CFC reporting and tax paying obligations. U.S. investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the CFC rules’ impact in their particular circumstances.

The Company’s ability to use its U.S. net operating loss carryforwards to offset its future U.S. taxable income may be subject to limitations.

The Company’s U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) generated in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018 may be carried forward for 20 years. The Company’s U.S. federal NOLs generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the utilization of such NOLs is limited. In addition, under Section 382 of the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its stock ownership over a three-year period) is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change U.S. federal NOLs to offset its future U.S. taxable income. If the Company has undergone an ownership change in the past, or if future changes in its stock ownership result in an ownership change, which may be outside of the Company's control, its ability to utilize its U.S. federal NOLs may be limited by Section 382 of the Code. It is uncertain if and to what extent U.S. states will conform to U.S. federal income tax law with respect to the treatment of NOLs. As a result, the Company’s ability to use its U.S. NOLs to offset its future U.S. taxable income may be subject to limitations, which could increase its tax liability and decrease its cash flow.

Tax and accounting requirements may change or be interpreted in ways that are unforeseen to the Company, and the Company may face difficulty or be unable to implement and/or comply with any such changes or interpretations.

The Company is subject to numerous tax and accounting requirements, and changes in existing rules or practices, varying interpretations of current rules or practices, or enactments of new rules or practices could have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial results, the manner in which the Company conducts its business, or the marketability of any of its products. For instance, the recently enacted Inflation Reduction Act imposes, among other rules, a 15% minimum tax on the book income of certain large corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases. In many countries, including the United States, the Company is subject to transfer pricing and other tax regulations designed to ensure that appropriate levels of income are reported as earned and are taxed accordingly. Although the Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all applicable regulations and restrictions, it is subject to the risk that governmental authorities could audit its transfer pricing and related practices and assert that additional taxes are owed or that various jurisdictions could assert that the Company should file tax returns in jurisdictions where it does not file and subject it to additional tax. In the future, the geographic scope of the Company’s business may expand, and such expansion will require the Company to comply with the tax laws and regulations of additional jurisdictions. Requirements as to taxation varies substantially among jurisdictions. Complying with the tax laws and regulations of these jurisdictions can be time-consuming and expensive and could potentially subject the Company to penalties and fees in the future if it failed to comply. In the event that the Company failed to comply with applicable tax laws and regulations, this could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law, and enforcement of cannabis laws could change. The Company may be subject to action by the U.S. federal government due to its involvement with cannabis in the United States, and such action could materially adversely affect the Company’s business.

While some states in the United States. have legalized the use and sale of cannabis in some form, it remains illegal under U.S. federal law. On January 4, 2018, then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memorandum to U.S. Attorneys which rescinded previous guidance from the DOJ specific to cannabis enforcement in the United States, including the Cole Memorandum, which stated that the DOJ would not prioritize the prosecution of cannabis-related violations of U.S. federal law in jurisdictions that had enacted laws legalizing medical cannabis in some form and had implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems. With the Cole Memorandum rescinded, U.S. federal prosecutors have greater discretion in determining whether to prosecute medical cannabis-related violations of U.S. federal law, though there was never such a policy statement in relation to United States and its territories with adult-use cannabis programs. Because the Company engages in cannabis-related activities in the United States, an increase in federal enforcement efforts with respect to current U.S. federal laws applicable to cannabis could cause financial damage to the Company. In addition, the Company is at risk of being prosecuted under U.S. federal law and having its assets seized.

The Companyʼs exposure to U.S. cannabis related activities are as follows:

Violations of any U.S. federal laws and regulations could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the U.S. federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but not limited to, disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities, civil forfeiture or divestiture. Any property owned by participants in the cannabis industry that is either used in the course of conducting or comprises the proceeds of a cannabis business could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and subsequent civil asset forfeiture. Even if the owner of the property were never charged with a crime, the property in question could still be seized and subject to an administrative proceeding by which, with minimal process, it could become subject to forfeiture. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including its reputation and ability to conduct business, the listing of its securities on various stock exchanges, its financial position, operating results, profitability or liquidity or the market price of its publicly traded shares. In addition, it is difficult for the Company to estimate the time or resources that would be needed for the investigation of any such matters or its final resolution because, in part, the time and resources that may be needed are dependent on the nature and extent of any information requested by the applicable authorities involved, and such time or resources could be substantial.

Unlike in Canada which has federal legislation uniformly governing the cultivation, distribution, sale and possession of cannabis under the Cannabis Act, investors are cautioned that in the United States, cannabis is largely regulated at the state level. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of cannabis at the state level, cannabis continues to be categorized as a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act and as such, is in violation of federal law in the United States. Further, there can be no assurance that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. It is also important to note that local and city ordinances may strictly limit and/or restrict the retailing of cannabis in a manner that will make it extremely difficult or impossible to transact business in the cannabis industry.

As stated above, the U.S. Congress has passed appropriations bills in each fiscal year since FY2015, that prevents the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. The continuing resolution contains, among other things, the RBA,

which prevents the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state medical cannabis laws.

Additionally, it is important to note that the appropriations protections only apply to medical cannabis operations and provide no protection against businesses operating in compliance with a state’s adult-use cannabis laws.

The DOJ or a federal prosecutor could allege that the Company, or its board of directors (the "Board of Directors" or the "Board") and, potentially its shareholders, “aided and abetted” violations of federal law by providing finances and services to its operating subsidiaries. Under these circumstances, it is possible that a federal prosecutor would seek to seize the assets of the Company and to recover the “illicit profits” previously distributed to shareholders resulting from any of the foregoing financing or services. In these circumstances, the Company’s operations could cease, shareholders of the Company may lose their entire investment and directors, officers and/or shareholders of the Company may be left to defend any criminal charges against them at their own expense and, if convicted, be sent to federal prison. Violations of any federal laws could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but not limited to, disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities or divestiture. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including its reputation and ability to conduct business, its holding (directly or indirectly) of cannabis licenses in the United States, the listing of its securities on any securities exchanges, its financial position, operating results, profitability or liquidity or the market price of its listed securities. An investor’s contribution to and involvement in the Company’s activities may result in federal civil and/or criminal prosecution, including forfeiture of an entire investment.

Although the 2018 Farm Bill, among other things, removes hemp from the controlled substances list under the Controlled Substances Act, it does not legalize CBD generally. In particular, the 2018 Farm Bill preserves the FDAʼs authority to regulate products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds. Pursuant to a statement released December 20, 2018, Frequently Asked Questions on the FDAʼs website, and numerous public statements, the FDA has taken the position that all CBD is a drug ingredient and therefore illegal to add to food or health products without the FDA's approval or further action. The FDA considers products containing CBD or other cannabis-derived compounds the same as any other FDA-regulated products and takes the position that they are subject to the same authorities and requirements as similarly regulated products, including but not limited to required approvals for food ingredients and dietary supplements based on safety standards. Importantly, the FDA has taken the position that it is unlawful under the FDCA to introduce food containing added CBD into interstate commerce, or to market CBD products as, or in, food or dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp derived. The FDA has however indicated that it will work towards providing ways for companies to seek approval from the FDA to market CBD products. Further, many state criminal laws and food and drug laws prohibit or restrict the production and/or sale of hemp-derived CBD products. The Companyʼs U.S. hemp operations were subject to FDA oversight. There is no guarantee that the Company would be able to obtain necessary approval from regulatory authorities for its products in the United States.

TerrAscendʼs activities and operations in the United States are, and will continue to be, subject to evolving regulation by governmental authorities. The approach to the enforcement of cannabis laws may be subject to change or may not proceed as previously outlined. The USDA will promulgate additional rules governing the production of hemp in the United States, with many states in the process of amending state laws to regulate hemp production and the sale of hemp-derived products within their borders. In addition, the FDA is expected to make determinations as to how CBD products will be regulated and is expected to issue a substantial change in its regulation of dietary supplements generally. Accordingly, there are significant changes in both federal and state law that may materially impact the Companyʼs operations.

The Company’s business is subject to applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations and have restricted access to capital markets, banking and other financial services, which may adversely affect its business.

Since the use of cannabis is currently illegal under U.S. federal law, and in light of considerations related to money laundering and other cannabis related criminality in the U.S. banking industry, U.S. banks have been reluctant to accept or deposit funds from businesses involved with the cannabis industry. Consequently, businesses involved in the cannabis industry often have difficulty finding banks willing to accept its business. Likewise, cannabis businesses have limited access, if any, to credit card processing services. As a result, cannabis businesses in the United States are largely cash-based. This complicates the implementation of financial controls and increases security issues. Furthermore, the Company maintains domestic cash deposits in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured banks that exceed the FDIC insurance limits. Bank failures, events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance, or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, or concerns or rumors about such events, may lead to liquidity constraints. There can be no assurance that our deposits in excess of the FDIC or other comparable insurance limits will be backstopped by the United States government, or that any bank or financial institution with which we do business will be able to obtain needed liquidity from other banks, government institutions, or by acquisition in the event of a failure or liquidity crisis.

While the Company is not able to obtain financing in the United States from traditional banks or other certain federally regulated entities, the Company has been able to access equity financing through private markets in both the United States and Canada. Commercial banks, private equity firms, and venture capital firms have approached the cannabis industry cautiously to date. However, there are increasing numbers of high-net-worth individuals and family offices that have made meaningful investments in companies and businesses similar to the Company. There is neither a broad nor deep pool of institutional capital that is available to cannabis license holders and license applicants. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if raised privately, will be available to the Company when needed or on terms which are acceptable to the Company. The Companyʼs inability to raise financing to fund its operations, capital expenditures or acquisitions could limit its growth and may have a material adverse effect upon future profitability.

Under the U.S. federal law, financial transactions in the United States involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution. The FinCEN division of the U.S. Department of Treasury has provided guidance for how financial institutions can provide services to the cannabis-related businesses consistent with the obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act.

Previously, the DOJ directed its federal prosecutors to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the Cole Memorandum when determining whether to charge institutions or individuals with any of the financial crimes described above based upon cannabis-related activity. In January 2018, the DOJ revoked the Cole Memorandum and related memorandum. While the impact remains unclear, the revocation has created uncertainty. For instance, federal prosecutors may increase enforcement activities against institutions or individuals who are engaged in financial transactions related to cannabis activities, or there may be a negative impact to the continuation of financial services in the United States with regard to cannabis-related activities. Consequently, businesses involved in the regulated cannabis industry may experience difficulties establishing banking relationships, and such difficulties may increase over time. If the Company were to experience any inability to access financial services in the United States, or have its existing financial services impacted, including its current bank accounts, this would have a direct impact on the ability for the Company to operate its businesses. This impact would increase the Companyʼs operating costs, and pose additional operational, logistical, and security challenges that could impede its inability to implement its business plans.

The U.S. federal prohibitions on the sale of cannabis may result in the Company and its partners being restricted from accessing the U.S. banking system and they may be unable to deposit funds in federally insured and licensed banking institutions. Banking restrictions could be imposed due to the Companyʼs banking institutions not accepting payments and deposits. The Company is at risk that any bank accounts it has could be closed at any time and result in increased costs for the Company. The Companyʼs activities in the United States, and any proceeds thereof, may be considered proceeds of crime due to the fact that cannabis remains federally illegal in the United States This may restrict the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends, effect other distributions or subsequently repatriate such funds back to Canada. Furthermore, while the Company has no current intention to declare or pay dividends on its Common Shares in the foreseeable future, the Company may decide or be required to suspend declaring or paying dividends without advance notice and for an indefinite period of time. The guidance provided in the FinCEN Memorandum as described above may change depended on the position of the U.S. government administration at any given time and is subject to revision or retraction in the future, which may restrict the Companyʼs access to banking services.

The Company operates in a highly regulated sector and may not always succeed in complying fully with applicable regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions which it operates, which could negatively affect its business.

Given the complexity of the U.S. regulation of the cannabis industry, certain requirements may prove to be excessively onerous or otherwise impractical for the Company to comply with. This may result in the exclusion of certain business opportunities from the list of possible transactions that the Company would otherwise consider. Further, U.S. laws and regulations at the local, state, and federal levels which apply to the cannabis industry are continually changing, and it is difficult to determine if future changes could detrimentally affect the operations of the Company. Given the broad scope of cannabis laws and regulations, these are subject to evolving interpretations. This continued evolution could require the Company to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter its business plan. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt the Companyʼs businesses and result in a material adverse effect on its operations.

The Companyʼs continued compliance with regulatory requirements enacted by government authorities and obtaining all regulatory approvals, where necessary, for the sale of its products, including maintain and renewing all applicable licenses, is crucial to the successful execution of the Companyʼs strategies. The cannabis industry is an emerging industry in the United States, and the Company cannot forecast the impact of each compliance regime to which they will be subject. Similarly, the Company cannot predict its ability to secure all appropriate regulatory approvals for any of its products, or the extent of testing or related documentation that may be required by governmental authorities. Delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain, regulatory approvals may significantly delay or impact the development of markets, products and sales initiatives and could have adverse

effect on the business, financial condition, and operating results of the Company. Without limiting the foregoing, the Companyʼs failure to comply with the requirements of any underlying licenses or any failure to maintain any underlying licenses would have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition, and operating results. It is uncertain whether any required licenses for the operation of the Companyʼs business will be extended or renewed in a timely manner, if at all, or that if they are extended or renewed, that the licenses will be extended or renewed on the same or similar terms.

Furthermore, Internet websites are visible by people everywhere, not just in jurisdiction where the activities described therein are considered legal. As a result, to the extent that the Company sells services or products via web-based links targeting only jurisdictions in which such sales or services are compliant with state law, the Company may face legal action in other jurisdictions which are not the intended object of any of the Company's marketing efforts for engaging in any web-based activity that results in sales into such jurisdictions deemed illegal under applicable laws.

Regulatory restrictions on ownership outside of the control of the Company may have a material adverse impact on the Company's operations in certain jurisdictions.

The Company's business is subject to oversight by regulators in each market that the Company operates in. Regulators may limit the type or number of licenses that a single company may own. As a result, the Company may be restricted from participating in certain cannabis businesses in specific markets as a result of ownership or control of other cannabis licenses. As an example, certain markets may limit the size of a company's cultivation space, limit the number of dispensaries a single-company may own, or may obligate a company to offer certain products, like medical cannabis, to consumers.

The Company faces further risk associated with restrictions on licenses as a result of the Company's inability to control public company shareholder ownership, and therefore the Company may inadvertently have certain restrictions placed on its ability to operate as a result of third-party ownership. Restrictions placed on the Company's ability to own specific licenses or assets in specific markets, or complexities arising from third-party ownership thresholds may materially adversely impact the Company's ability to compete in a specific market or may cause other regulatory delays in receiving regulatory approval for certain activities.

Failure to comply with privacy or medical practice laws and regulations may result in impacts to operations, monetary fines or litigation.

The Company maintains an array of sensitive information, including confidential business and personal information in connection with its operations, and is subject to laws and regulations governing the privacy and security of such information. The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and the Company may be affected by or subject to new, amended, or existing laws and regulations in the future, including as its operations continue to expand and the Company operates in additional markets. Each market may be subject to differing laws or legal interpretations, which adds to the complexity of collecting, using, disclosing, and processing personal data, and emerging cannabis markets may make changes to their legal frameworks.

In the United States, there are numerous federal and state privacy and data security laws and regulations governing the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of personal information, including federal and state health information privacy laws, federal and state security breach notification laws and federal and state consumer protection laws. Each of these laws is subject to varying interpretations and constantly evolving. For example, certain state laws govern the privacy and security of personal information, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Additionally, in the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) imposes privacy and security requirements and breach reporting obligations with respect to individually identifiable health information upon “covered entities” (health plans, health care clearinghouses and certain health care providers), and their respective business associates, individuals or entities that create, received, maintain or transmit protected health information in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a covered entity. HIPAA mandates the reporting of certain breaches of health information to the HHS, affected individuals and if the breach is large enough, the media. Entities that are found to be in violation of HIPAA as the result of a breach of unsecured protected health information, a complaint about privacy practices or an audit by HHS, may be subject to significant civil, criminal, and administrative fines and penalties and/or additional reporting and oversight obligations if required to enter into a resolution agreement and corrective action plan with HHS to settle allegations of HIPAA non-compliance. In addition, provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act require confidential treatment of employee medical records.

In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronics Documents Act (Canada) (“PIPEDA”) and comparable legislation at the provincial level, governs the treatment of private information held by a corporation. The Office of the Privacy

Commissioner of Canada has stated that it considers the personal information of cannabis users to be considered sensitive. Canadian privacy jurisprudence regarding the obligations that private sector organizations have to individual data subjects is constantly evolving. Privacy laws in Canada are also changing at the legislative level. On November 17, 2020, the Canadian Federal Government introduced Bill C-11, An Act to enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act and the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, for consideration in the House of Commons. Should Bill C-11 come into force, all private organizations that collect, use, and disclose personal information will become subject to new obligations and restrictions, including, without limitation, in connection with obtaining consent, access and control over personal information, deletion of personal information, data portability, de-identification of personal information, and transparency requirements. The penalties and enforcement measures available to Canadian regulators for non-compliance that are contemplated under Bill C-11 and Bill-64 are more significant than those that are available under current privacy and data protection legislation in Canada.

In addition, with respect to consumer health information, there are a number of federal, state and provincial laws protecting the confidentiality of certain patient health information, including patient records, and restricting the use and disclosure of that protected information. For example, the privacy rules under PIPEDA and other applicable privacy laws protect medical records and other personal health information by limiting their use and disclosure of health information to the minimum level reasonably necessary to accomplish the intended purpose and may apply to its operations globally. In Canada, we may also be required to retain certain customer personal information for prescribed periods of time pursuant to the Cannabis Act.

Overall, failure to maintain adequate compliance or safeguards regarding stakeholder privacy could materially adversely impact the Company’s business and result in fines, litigation, or certain government mandated actions, and could be detrimental to the Company’s ability to operate its business. See the section titled “The Company is or may become subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, rules, contractual obligations, policies and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Its actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of the Company's business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; and other adverse business consequences” for additional information regarding the privacy laws and regulations to which we may become subject and about the risks to our business associated with such laws and regulations.

The Company’s products may be subject to product recalls or returns, which may result in expense, legal proceedings, regulatory action, loss of sales and reputation, and management attention.

The Companyʼs products may be subject to recall or return for a variety of reasons, including product defects such as contamination, unintended harmful side effects or interactions with other substances, packaging safety and inadequate or inaccurate labeling disclosure. In certain circumstances, state regulators may change certain regulations after products are already in the market, that may require the Company to issue a recall. If any of the Companyʼs products are recalled due to an alleged product defect or for any other reason, the Company could be required to incur the unexpected expense of the recall and any legal proceedings that might arise in connection therewith. The Company may lose a significant amount of sales and may not be able to replace those sales at an acceptable margin or at all, in addition to writing off a substantial amount of inventory or materials. Additionally, a product recall may require significant management attention. Although the Company has detailed procedures in place for testing its products, there can be no assurance that any quality, potency or contamination problems will be detected in time to avoid unforeseen product recalls, regulatory action or lawsuits. If one of the products produced by the Company were subject to recall, the image of that product and the Company could be harmed. A recall for any of the foregoing reasons could lead to decreased demand for the Companyʼs products and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. Additionally, product recalls may lead to increased scrutiny of the Companyʼs operations by regulatory agencies, requiring further management attention and potential legal fees and other expenses.

The Company faces an inherent risk of product liability claims and other consumer protection claims as a manufacturer, processor and producer of products that are meant to be ingested by people, and dealing with such claims could cause the Company to incur substantial expenses and have a material adverse effect on its business.

As a manufacturer of products designed to be ingested by humans, the Company faces an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, regulatory action and litigation if its products are alleged to have caused loss or injury. In addition, the manufacturing and sale of cannabis and other products involve the risk of injury to consumers due to tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination, or unauthorized sale of counterfeit products. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption of cannabis products alone or in combination with other medications or substances could occur. Furthermore, safety, efficacy and quality of cannabis in general, or the Company’s products specifically, or associating the consumption of cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have such a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company may be also subject to various product liability claims, including, among others, that the products produced by the Company caused injury or illness, include inadequate instructions for use or include inadequate warnings

concerning possible inebriating effects, side effects or interactions with other substances. Consumers may unlawfully operate a vehicle or heavy equipment while under the effects of the Company’s products, resulting in increased liability to the Company. A product liability claim or regulatory action against the Company could result in increased costs, could adversely affect the Companyʼs reputation with its clients and consumers generally, and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

The Companyʼs products may be considered misbranded or adulterated, or otherwise unlawful under federal and state food and drug laws and could subject the Company to local, federal, or state enforcement or private litigation. Some states permit advertising, labeling laws, false and deceptive trade practices, and other consumer-protection laws to be enforced by state attorney generals, who may seek relief for consumers, class action certifications, class wide damages and product recalls of products sold by the Company. Private litigation may also seek relief for consumers, class action certifications, class wide damages and product recalls of products sold by the Company in any of the markets in which it operates. Any actions against the Company by governmental authorities or private litigants could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company may be subject to constraints on and differences in marketing its products under varying regulatory restrictions.

The development of the Companyʼs business and results of operations may be hindered by applicable regulatory restrictions on sales and marketing activities. For example, regulations may prohibit certain sales and marketing activities that may be deemed to target minors or make specified health claims. If the Company is unable to effectively market its products and compete for market share, or if the costs of compliance with government legislation and regulation cannot be absorbed through increased selling prices for the Companyʼs products, the Companyʼs sales and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Company may be subject to heightened scrutiny by Canadian regulatory authorities, which could negatively affect its business.

The Companyʼs future investments, joint ventures and operations in the United States may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada. As a result, the Company may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead to the imposition of certain restrictions on the Companyʼs ability to invest in the United States or any other jurisdiction, in addition to those described herein.

Although a memorandum of understanding signed by the Canadian Depository for Securities (“CDS”) and the Canadian recognized exchanges (Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc., the CSE, the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") and the TSX Venture Exchange) dated February 8, 2018, confirms that CDS relies on the exchanges to review the conduct of listed issuers, and therefore there is currently no CDS ban on the clearing of securities of issuers with cannabis-related activities in the United States, there can be no guarantee that this approach to regulation will continue in the future. If such a ban were to be implemented, it would have a material adverse effect on the ability of holders of Common Shares to make and settle trades. In particular, Common Shares would become highly illiquid as and until an alternative was implemented, investors would have no ability to affect a trade of Common Shares through the facilities of a stock exchange.

The Company’s investors and directors, officers and employees who are not U.S. citizens may be denied entry into the U.S., which may negatively affect the Company’s business.

Because cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law, those employed at or investing in Canadian or state regulated cannabis companies could face detention, denial of entry or lifetime bans from the United States for their business associations or investments. Entry happens at the sole discretion of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers on duty, and these officers have wide latitude to ask questions to determine the admissibility of a foreign national. The Government of Canada has started warning travelers on its website that previous use of cannabis, or any substance prohibited by U.S. federal laws, could mean denial of entry to the U.S. Business or financial involvement in the legal cannabis industry in Canada or in the United States could also be reason enough for U.S. border guards to deny entry.

Because the Company’s contracts involve cannabis and related activities, which are not legal under U.S. federal law, the Company may face difficulties in enforcing its contracts.

It is a fundamental principle of law that a contract will not be enforced if it involves a violation of law or public policy. Because cannabis remains illegal at a federal level, judges may refuse to enforce contracts in connection with activities that violate U.S. federal law, even if there is no violation of state law. There remains doubt and uncertainty that the Company will be able to legally enforce contracts it enters into if necessary. The Company cannot be assured that it will have a remedy for breach of

contract, the lack of which may have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, revenues, operating results, financial condition or prospects.

The Company may encounter increasingly strict environmental health and safety regulations in connection with its operations, which may harm the Company’s business.

The Companyʼs operations are subject to environmental and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions and discharges to water, air and land, the handling and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials and wastes, and employee health and safety. Changes in environmental, employee health and safety or other laws, more vigorous enforcement thereof or other unanticipated events could require extensive changes to the Companyʼs operations or give rise to material liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Operations and Industry

The Company’s outstanding indebtedness may adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. the Company’s failure to comply with applicable covenants could trigger events that may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s outstanding indebtedness may adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $206,453 of total debt principal amounts outstanding. See the section titled "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources" of this Annual Report for more information regarding the Company's indebtedness. As a result of its indebtedness, a portion of the Company's cash flow will be required to pay interest and principal on its outstanding loans. The Company's indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could

The Company expects to use cash flow from operations and outside financings to meet its current and future financial obligations, including funding its operations, debt service and capital expenditures. The Company’s ability to make these payments depends on its future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which the Company cannot control. The Company’s business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, which could result in the Company being unable to repay indebtedness, or to fund other liquidity needs. If the Company does not generate sufficient cash from operations, it may be forced to reduce or delay its business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of its debt on or before maturity. The Company cannot make any assurances that it will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to it, or at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future indebtedness may limit the Company’s ability to pursue any of these alternatives.

Furthermore, the instruments governing the Company’s indebtedness include obligations and covenants that limit the Company’s discretion with respect to certain business matters and require the Company to satisfy certain financial requirements. The Company may not receive consent from lenders to take certain actions such as divest assets or enter into material agreements. The Company can make no assurances that it will be able to comply with such obligations and covenants and any failure to comply could result in a default, which, if not amended, cured or waived, could permit acceleration of the indebtedness and the exercise of other remedies available to lenders. In such event, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to obtain any amendment, cure, waiver or other relief on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Company is

unable to obtain relief from an event of the relevant indebtedness may be accelerated and the related collateral may be foreclosed upon, in addition such circumstances may result in the cross-default or cross-acceleration of other debt, any of which would materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The Company may require substantial additional financing to operate its business and it may face difficulties acquiring additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.

The building and operation of the Companyʼs business, including its facilities, are capital intensive. In order to execute the anticipated growth strategy, the Company may require additional equity and/or debt financing to support on-going operations, to undertake capital expenditures or to undertake acquisitions or other business combination transactions. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed or on terms which are acceptable. The Companyʼs inability to raise financing to support on-going operations or to fund capital expenditures or acquisitions could limit the Companyʼs growth and may have a material adverse effect upon future profitability and solvency. Any debt financing secured in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for the Company to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.

Raising additional funds by issuing equity securities will cause dilution to existing stockholders. Raising additional funds through debt financings may involve restrictive covenants and raising funds through lending and licensing arrangements may restrict its operations or require it to relinquish proprietary rights. The Company may not be able to secure additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms or at all.

The Company expects that significant additional capital may be needed in the future to continue its planned operations. The Company expects to finance its cash needs through cash flow from ongoing operations and a combination of equity offerings, debt financings and other strategies. The Company cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. If the Company raises additional equity financing, its shareholders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that could adversely affect the rights of a common shareholder, and the per-share value of the Company’s Common Shares could decline. If the Company engages in debt financing, it may be required to accept terms that restrict or limit the Company’s ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional indebtedness, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends, and other restrictive covenants that could adversely impact the Company’s ability to conduct its business. In addition, weakness and volatility in the capital markets and the economy in general could limit the Company's access to the capital markets and increase its cost of borrowing.

An adverse change in market conditions, including a sustained decline in the price of the Common Shares, negative changes to the Company’s position in the market, or lack of growth in demand for its products and services could be considered to be an impairment triggering event. Such changes could impact valuation assumptions relating to the recoverability of assets and have resulted in, and may in the future result in, impairment charges to the Company’s goodwill or long-lived asset balances, which would negatively impact the Company’s operating results and harm its business.

There are inherent uncertainties in management’s estimates, judgments and assumptions used in assessing recoverability of goodwill, intangible, and other long-lived assets. Any material changes in key assumptions, including failure to meet business plans, a deterioration in the United States, Canadian and global financial markets, an increase in interest rate or an increase in the cost of equity financing by market participants within the industry or other unanticipated events and circumstances, could potentially result in an impairment charge. From time to time, the Company may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in its consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of the Company’s goodwill or intangible and other long-lived assets is determined, which might have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s business operations and its financial position or results of operations.

The Company may be required to write down intangible assets, including goodwill, due to impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

The Company may be required to write down intangible assets, including goodwill, due to impairment, which would reduce earnings. The Company periodically calculates the fair value of its reporting units and intangible assets to test for impairment. This calculation may be affected by several factors, including general economic conditions, regulatory developments, market and economic conditions, impact on operations due to changing consumer preferences, successful execution of product launches and overall competitive activity within the market. Certain events can also trigger an immediate review of goodwill and intangible assets. If the carrying value of its reporting unit and other intangible assets exceed their fair value and the loss in value is other than temporary, the goodwill and other intangible assets are considered impaired, which would result in impairment losses and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of

operations. We may be required to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment assessment in future periods for the Company, to the extent the Company experiences declines in the price of its Common Shares.

The Company faces intense competition and its business could be adversely affected by other businesses in a better competitive position.

The introduction of an adult-use model for cannabis production and distribution may impact the growth in the existing medical cannabis market. The impact of this potential development may be negative for the Company and could result in increased levels of competition in its existing medical market and/or the entry of new competitors in the overall cannabis market in which the Company operates, in addition to potential gross margin reduction. There is potential that the Company will face intense competition from other companies, particularly larger multi-state operators, some of which can be expected to have longer operating histories and more financial resources and manufacturing and marketing experience than the Company. Increased competition by larger and better financed competitors could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company and result in lower than anticipated growth in both the existing medical cannabis market and the adult-use market.

If the number of users of medical cannabis in North America increases, the demand for products will increase and the Company expects that competition will become more intense, as current and future competitors begin to offer an increasing number of diversified products. To remain competitive, the Company may require a continued high level of investment in research and development, marketing, sales and client support, or reduction in product prices. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain research and development, marketing, sales and client support efforts on a competitive basis, which could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Consolidation in the cannabis industry and other changes to the competitive environment can impact the Company's margins and profitability.

The markets for cannabis in the United States and Canada are becoming increasingly competitive and are evolving rapidly. The Company may face intense and increasing competition from existing operators and new entrants in each of the markets in which the Company operates. Some of these competitors may have longer operating histories or offer competitive products. There is also the potential that the cannabis industry will undergo further consolidation that may pose a risk to the Company’s ability to compete.

As a result of this competition, the Company may be unable to maintain its operations or develop them as currently intended. Increased competition by larger, better-financed competitors with geographic advantages could materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. If the Company is unable to achieve its business objectives, such failure could materially adversely affect the Company's business.

As the emerging cannabis industry continues to rapidly evolve, the Company may not be able to create and maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The Company's success will depend on its ability to respond to, among other things, changes in consumer preferences, regulatory conditions, and general competitive pressures. Should the Company be unable to adequately respond to such changes, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, cash flow and operational performance.

In each market the Company operates in, the number of licenses granted, and the number of license holders ultimately authorized by the regulator, or previously authorized licenses becoming more commercially active, could have an impact on its business. If the number of users of medical and/or adult-use cannabis increases, the demand for products will increase and the Company expects that competition will become more intense, as current and future competitors begin to offer an increasing number of diversified products. To remain competitive, the Company may require increased levels in research and development, sales and customer support. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain research and development, sales and customer support efforts on a competitive basis which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

The cannabis industry and market are relatively new, and this industry and market may not continue to exist or grow as expected.

The Company is operating its business in a relatively new industry and market. Competitive conditions, consumer preferences, patient requirements and spending patterns in this new industry and market are relatively unknown and may have unique circumstances that differ from existing industries and markets. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this industry and market will continue to exist or grow as currently estimated or anticipated, or function and evolve in a manner consistent with

management’s expectations and assumptions. Any event or circumstance that affects the cannabis industry and market could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Companyʼs success in North America is dependent on the market building out direct to consumer channels including but not limited to retail outlets. There are many factors which could impact the Companyʼs ability to gain market share and distribute its products, including but not limited to the continued growth and expansion of retail outlets in the North American market which may have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, operating results and financial condition. The Companyʼs ability to continue to grow, process, store and sell medical cannabis and participate in the adult-use cannabis markets is dependent on the maintenance and validity of the Companyʼs licenses from regulatory authorities.

The Company's profitability may be impacted by declining wholesale or retail cannabis prices in certain markets and shifting market conditions.

The Company’s gross profits may decline as a result of reduction in wholesale or retail cannabis prices. The Company’s profitability is sensitive to fluctuations in wholesale and retail prices caused by crop seasonality, disruptions to supply chains, increased competition, government taxes or levies, and other market conditions, all of which are factors beyond the Company’s control. There is currently not an established market price for cannabis and the price of may change rapidly. Any price decline may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

If a significant number of new licenses are granted by a regulator in a market in which the Company operates, the Company may experience increased competition for market share and may experience downward price pressure on its products as new entrants increase production. The Company may also face competition from illegal cannabis dispensaries that are selling cannabis to individuals despite not having a valid license. The continued declining wholesale and retail price will impact the Company’s overall business.

The Company has historically had negative cash flow from operating activities, and continued losses could have a material negative effect on The Company's business and prospects and impact its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company started sales in April 2018 and historically has had negative cash flow from operating activities. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $704,162. The Company incurred losses in fiscal year 2022 and fiscal year 2023. The Company may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability and may continue to incur significant losses in the future. The Company's cash flow and net losses for the year ended December 31, 2023 are indicators that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the issuance of these financial statements. In addition, debt service requirements will have an adverse impact on liquidity. Because the cannabis industry and market are relatively new and rapidly evolving, it is difficult for the Company to predict its future operating results. As a result, it may incur future losses that may be larger than anticipated. In addition, the Company may continue to increase operating expenses as it implements initiatives to continue to grow its business. The Company's ability to execute on its growth strategy requires significant additional financing. The Company may need to raise additional funds in order to operate its business and meet obligations as they become due. However, financing may not be available to the Company in the necessary time frame, in amounts that the Company requires, on terms that are acceptable to the Company, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise the necessary funds when needed, it will be required to take additional actions to address its liquidity needs, including cost reduction measures, it would materially and adversely impact the Company's ability to execute on its operating plans. If the Company becomes unable to continue as a going concern, the Company may have to dispose of assets and might realize significantly less than the values at which are carried on its consolidated financial statements. These actions may cause the Company's stockholders to lose all or part of their investment in the Company's Common Stock. If the Companyʼs sales do not increase to offset these expected increases in costs and operating expenses, the Company will not be profitable. Furthermore, if the Company's future growth and operating performance fail to meet investor or analyst expectations, or if it has future negative cash flow or losses resulting from its investment in product development or marketing, its financial condition and share price could be materially adversely affected.

The Company may be affected by currency fluctuations.

The Company may face exposure to currency fluctuations because of its present operations in the United States. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is earned in U.S. dollars, but its shares, and some of its employee stock options and certain warrants issued to holders of the Company’s notes are denominated in Canadian dollars which can provide variability for results of operations. The Company does not have currency hedging arrangements in place and there is no expectation that it will put

any currency hedging arrangements in place in the future. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position or results of operations.

Demand for the Company’s products is difficult to forecast due to limited and unreliable market data.

As a result of recent and ongoing regulatory and policy changes in the medical and adult-use cannabis industry, the market data available is limited and unreliable. Federal and state laws prevent widespread participation and hinder market research. Therefore, the Company must rely largely on its own market research to forecast sales as detailed forecasts are not generally obtainable from other sources at this early stage of the industry. Market research and projections by the Company of estimated total retail sales, demographics, demand, and similar consumer research are based on assumptions from limited and unreliable market data, and generally represent the personal opinions of the Companyʼs management team as of the date of this Annual. A failure in the demand for its products to materialize as a result of competition, technological change or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the Company.

The Company’s inability to attract and retain key personnel, or its inability to maintain relations with its employees, unions and other employee representatives, could materially adversely affect its business.

The success of the Company is dependent upon the ability, expertise, judgment, discretion and good faith of its senior management, which are key personnel. Moreover, the Companyʼs future success depends on its continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. Qualified individuals are in high demand, and the Company may incur significant costs to attract and retain them. The Company does not maintain "key man" insurance policies on the lives of its key personnel, or the lives of any of its other employees. In order to induce valuable employees to continue their employment with the company, the Company has provided certain key personnel stock options and restricted stock units that vest over time. The value to employees of such equity grants that vest over time is significantly affected by movements in the Company's share price that are beyond the Company's control, and may at any time be insufficient to counteract more lucrative offers from other companies. In addition, if the Company's share-based compensation otherwise ceases to be viewed as a valuable benefit, the Company's ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel could be weakened, which could harm its business. The loss of the services of key personnel, or an inability to attract other suitably qualified persons when needed, could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs ability to execute on its business plan and strategy, and the Company may be unable to find adequate replacements on a timely basis, or at all. While employment agreements are customarily used as a primary method of retaining the services of such key personnel these agreements cannot assure the continued services of such employees.

There is no assurance that any of the Companyʼs existing personnel who presently or may in the future require a security clearance will be able to obtain or renew such clearances or that new personnel who require a security clearance will be able to obtain one. A failure by such key personnel to maintain or renew their security clearance would result in a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if any key personnel leave the Company, and the Company is unable to find a suitable replacement that has a security clearance in a timely manner, or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company may not be able to attract or retain qualified management and other key employees in the future due to the intense competition for a limited number of qualified personnel in its industry. Many of the other cannabis companies that it competes against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than the Company does. They also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high quality candidates than what the Company has to offer. If the Company is unable to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, the rate and success at which it can develop and market its products will be limited.

In addition, certain of the Company’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements typically contain provisions regarding the general working conditions of such employees, including provisions that could affect the Company’s ability to restructure its operations, close facilities, or reduce the number of its employees. The Company may not be able to extend existing collective bargaining agreements or, upon the expiration of such agreements, negotiate such agreements in a favorable and timely manner or without work stoppages, strikes or similar actions. Any deterioration of the relationships with its employees, unions and other employee representatives, or any material work stoppage, strike or similar action could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business results, cash flows, financial condition or prospects. Furthermore, The Company’s actions or responses to any such negotiations, labor disputes, work stoppages or strikes could negatively impact its corporate reputation and have adverse effects on its business.

The Company may face unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of the safety, efficacy and quality of its cannabis products.

The Company believes the cannabis industry is highly dependent upon consumer perception regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of the cannabis distributed to such consumers. Consumer perception of the Companyʼs products can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings, regulatory investigations, litigation, media attention and other publicity regarding the consumption of medical cannabis products. There can be no assurance that future scientific research, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other research findings or publicity will be favorable to the medical cannabis market or any particular product, or consistent with earlier publicity.

Future research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other publicity that are perceived as less favorable than, or that question, earlier research reports, findings or publicity could have a material adverse effect on the demand for the Companyʼs products and the business, results of operations, financial condition of the Company. In particular, adverse publicity reports or other media attention regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of cannabis in general, or the Companyʼs products specifically, or associating the consumption of cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have such a material adverse effect. Such adverse publicity reports or other media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to consume such products appropriately or as directed.

Further, adverse publicity reports or other media attention regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of cannabis in general, or the Company’s products specifically, or associating the consumption of cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have such a material adverse effect on the Company. Although the Company uses quality control processes and procedures to ensure our consumer packaged goods meet our standards, a failure or alleged failure of such processes and procedures could result in negative consumer perception of products or legal claims against the Company. Adverse publicity reports or other media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to consume such products appropriately or as directed.

The Company offers certain vaporizer or “vape” products. The use of vape products and vaping may pose health risks. According to the Centers for Disease Control, vape products may contain ingredients that are known to be toxic to humans and may contain other ingredients that may not be safe. Because clinical studies about the safety and efficacy of vape products have not been submitted to the FDA, consumers currently have no way of knowing whether they are safe for their intended use or what types or concentrations of potentially harmful chemicals or by-products are found in these products. It is also uncertain what implications the use of vape or other inhaled products, such as cannabis flower that is smoked, may have on respiratory illnesses. Although the Company believes that it takes care in protecting its image and reputation, the Company does not ultimately have direct control over how it is perceived by others. Adverse findings, regulatory investigations, litigation, media attention and other publicity regarding the consumption of vape or other inhaled products, including adverse publicity regarding underage use of vape or other inhaled products, may result in reputation loss and in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing and maintaining community relations and an impediment to the Companyʼs overall ability to advance its business, thereby having a material adverse impact on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The Company faces reputational risks, which may negatively impact its business.

Damage to the Companyʼs reputation can be the result of the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, and could include any negative publicity, whether true or not. The increased usage of social media and other web-based tools used to generate, publish, and discuss user-generated content and to connect with other users has made it increasingly easier for individuals and groups to communicate and share opinions and views regarding the Company and its activities, whether true or not. Although the Company believes that it operates in a manner that is respectful to all shareholders and that it takes care in protecting its image and reputation, the Company does not ultimately have direct control over how it is perceived by others. Reputation loss may result in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing and maintaining community relations, and an impediment to the Companyʼs overall ability to advance its projects, thereby having a material adverse impact on financial performance, financial condition, cash flows, and growth prospects. Further, the parties with which the Company does business may perceive that they are exposed to reputational risk as a result of the Companyʼs cannabis business activities. Failure to establish or maintain business relationships could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company is dependent on suppliers and key inputs for the cultivation, extraction and production of cannabis products.

The ability of the Company to compete and grow will be dependent on it having access, at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner, to required equipment, parts and components. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in maintaining its required supply of equipment, parts and components. Global supply challenges have added further uncertainties around availability and price of equipment, parts and components. It is also possible that the final costs of the major equipment contemplated by the Companyʼs capital expenditure plans may be significantly greater than anticipated by the Companyʼs

management and may be greater than funds available to the Company, in which circumstance the Company may curtail, or extend the timeframes for completing, its capital expenditure plans. This could have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company.

The cannabis business is dependent on a number of key inputs and their related costs including raw materials and supplies related to growing operations, as well as electricity, water and other local utilities. Any significant interruption or negative change in the availability or economics of the supply chain for key inputs could materially impact the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company. In addition, any restrictions on the ability to secure required supplies or utility services or to do so on commercially acceptable terms could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition and operating results. Some of these inputs may only be available from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. If a sole source supplier was to go out of business, the Company might be unable to find a replacement for such source in a timely manner or at all. If a sole source supplier were to be acquired by a competitor, that competitor may elect not to sell to the Company in the future. Any inability to secure required supplies and services or to do so on appropriate terms and/or agreeable terms could have a materially adverse impact on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company.

The Companyʼs business is subject to the risks inherent in agricultural operations.

The Companyʼs business involves the cultivation of the cannabis plant. The cultivation of this plant is subject to agricultural risks related to insects, plant diseases, unstable growing conditions, water and electricity availability and cost, and force majeure events. Certain agricultural risks, such as insects or plant diseases, can result in a prolonged disruption of its operations. Although the Company cultivates its cannabis plants indoors or in greenhouses, each with climate-controlled rooms staffed by trained personnel, there can be no assurance that agricultural risks will not have a material adverse effect on the cultivation of its cannabis. The Company may in the future cultivate cannabis plants outdoors, which would also subject it to related agricultural risks.

The Company may be adversely impacted by rising or volatile energy costs.

The Companyʼs cannabis growing and manufacturing operations consume considerable energy, which make the Company vulnerable to rising energy costs. Accordingly, rising or volatile energy costs have and may further adversely impact the Company's business and profitability. Furthermore, the Company may face challenges in accessing sufficient utilities to meet the energy, water or sewage requirements for cannabis growing and manufacturing operations.

The Companyʼs intellectual property may be difficult to protect, and failure to do so may negatively impact its business.

The ownership and protection of trademarks, patents, trade secrets and intellectual property rights are significant aspects of the Companyʼs future success. The Company has no patented technology or trademarked business methods at this time, nor has it registered any patents. The Company has filed trademark applications in the United States and Canada. The Company will continue to seek trademark protection in the United States and Canada.

The Company’s ability to obtain registered trademark protection for cannabis-related goods and services, in particular for cannabis itself, may be limited in certain countries outside of Canada, including the United States, where registered federal trademark protection is currently unavailable for trademarks covering cannabis-related products and services that are illegal under the Controlled Substances Act. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to obtain intellectual property rights or enforce intellectual property rights against third party uses of similar trademarks may be limited in certain countries. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office released a policy on May 2, 2019 that clarifies that applications for trademarks for products that meet the definition of hemp could be accepted for registration, with certain exceptions.

Even if the Company moves to protect its technology with trademarks, patents, copyrights or by other means, the Company is not assured that competitors will not develop similar technology, business methods or that the Company will be able to exercise its legal rights. The Company may have limited or no enforcement options should its intellectual property be infringed on by illicit operators. Furthermore, other countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same standards as the United States or Canada. Actions taken to protect or preserve intellectual property rights may require significant financial and other resources which may have a significant impact on the Companyʼs ability to successfully grow the business.

In addition, other parties may claim that the Companyʼs products infringe on their proprietary and perhaps patent protected rights. Such claims, whether or not meritorious, may result in the Companyʼs expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources, legal fees, result in injunctions, temporary restraining orders and/or require the payment of damages.

The Company and investors may have difficulty enforcing their legal rights.

In the event of a dispute arising from TerrAscendʼs U.S. operations, TerrAscend may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdictions of courts in Canada. Similarly, to the extent that the Companyʼs assets are located outside of Canada, investors may have difficulty collecting from the Company any judgments obtained in the Canadian courts and predicated on the civil liability portions of securities provisions. The Company may also be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental entity or instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

The Company (and the third parties upon which it relies) faces physical security risks, as well as risks related to its information technology systems, potential cyber-attacks, and security breaches.

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company, and the third parties upon which it relies, collects, receives, stores, processes, generates, uses, transfers, discloses, makes accessible, protects, secures, disposes of, transmits, and shares personal data about its patients, adult-use customers and guests and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, intellectual property, sensitive third-party data, business plans, transactions, and financial information (collectively, "sensitive data"). The Company is responsible for protecting sensitive data from security breaches.

If there was a breach in physical security systems and the Company became victim to a robbery or theft or if there was a failure of information technology systems or a component of information technology systems, or if the Company's sensitive data were compromised, it could, depending on the nature of any such breach, failure or compromise, adversely impact the Companyʼs reputation, business continuity and results of operations. Any such security breach, failure or compromise could expose the Company to additional liability and to potentially costly litigation, government enforcement actions, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, indemnification obligations, negative publicity, increase expenses relating to the resolution and future prevention of these breaches and may deter potential customers from choosing the Companyʼs products. Given the nature of the Companyʼs products and its lack of legal availability outside of channels approved by the government of the United States, as well as the concentration of inventory in its facilities, there remains a risk of shrinkage as well as theft.

A security breach may occur through procedural or process failure, information technology malfunction, or deliberate unauthorized intrusions. Cyber-attacks, malicious internet-based activity, online and offline fraud, and other similar activities threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Company’s sensitive data and information technology systems, and those of the third parties upon which it relies. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors.

Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, the Company and the third parties upon which it relies may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt its systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute its services.

The Company and the third parties upon which it relies are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing), credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, cable cuts, damage to physical plants, power loss, vandalism, theft, and other similar threats.

In particular, severe ransomware attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in the Company’s operations, loss of sensitive data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but the Company may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.

Remote work has become more common and has increased risks to the Company’s information technology systems and data, as more of its employees utilize network connections, computers, and devices outside its premises or network, including working at home, while in transit and in public locations. Additionally, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose the Company to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as its systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, the Company may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into the Company’s information technology environment and security program should any security issues be identified.

In addition, the Company's reliance on third-party service providers could introduce new cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, including supply-chain attacks, and other threats to its business operations. The Company has entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology (or “IT”) services in connection with its operations. The Company’s ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If its third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, the Company could experience adverse consequences. While the Company may be entitled to damages if its third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to the Company, any award may be insufficient to cover the Company’s damages, or the Company may be unable to recover such award. In addition, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and the Company cannot guarantee that third parties’ infrastructure in its supply chain or its third-party partners’ supply chains have not been compromised.

The Companyʼs operations depend, in part, on how well it and its suppliers protect networks, equipment, IT systems and software against damage from of the aforementioned or similar threats. The Companyʼs operations also depend on the timely maintenance, upgrade and replacement of networks, equipment, IT systems and software, as well as pre-emptive expenses to mitigate the risks of failures. Any of these and other events could the Company’s ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If its third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, the Company could experience adverse consequences. While the Company may be entitled to damages if its third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to the Company, any award may be insufficient to cover the Company’s damages, or the Company may be unable to recover such award. In addition, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and the Company cannot guarantee that third parties’ infrastructure in its supply chain or its third-party partners’ supply chains have not been compromised.

The Company may expend significant resources or modify its business activities to try to protect against security breaches. Additionally, certain data privacy and security obligations may require the Company to implement and maintain specific security measures or industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect its information technology systems and sensitive data.

While the Company has implemented security measures designed to protect against security breaches, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. The Company takes steps to detect and remediate vulnerabilities, but it may not be able to detect and remediate all vulnerabilities because the threats and techniques used to exploit the vulnerability change frequently and are often sophisticated in nature. Therefore, such vulnerabilities could be exploited but may not be detected until after a security incident has occurred. These vulnerabilities pose material risks to the Company’s business. Further, the Company may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities.

Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require the Company to notify relevant stakeholders of security breaches. Such disclosures are costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences.

The Company’s contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in its contracts are sufficient to protect it from liabilities, damages, or claims related to its data privacy and security obligations. The Company cannot be sure that its insurance coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect it from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of its privacy and security practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.

In addition to experiencing a security breach, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive data about it from public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about the Company and could be used to undermine its competitive advantage or market position.

The Company is or may become subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, rules, contractual obligations, policies and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Its actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of the Company's business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; and other adverse business consequences.

The Company’s data processing activities may subject it to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements, and other obligations relating to data privacy and security.

In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data breach notification laws, personal data privacy laws, consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade

Commission Act), and other similar laws (e.g., wiretapping laws). For example, there are a number of federal, state, and local laws protecting the confidentiality of certain health-related information of the Company’s patients and customers, including their health-related records, and restricting the use and disclosure of that information.

Additionally, in the past few years, numerous U.S. states including California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services. Certain states also impose stricter requirements for processing certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state laws allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the CCPA, with amendments from the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”), applies to personal data of consumers, business representatives, and employees who are California residents, and requires businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for fines of up to $7,500 per intentional violation and allows private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages.

Similar laws have passed or are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels, and we expect more states to pass similar laws in the future. These developments may further complicate compliance efforts, as well as increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and the third parties upon whom we rely.

Furthermore, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 and the TCPA impose specific requirements on communications with customers. For example, the TCPA imposes various consumer consent requirements and other restrictions on certain telemarketing activity and other communications with consumers by phone, fax or text message. TCPA violations can result in significant financial penalties, including penalties or criminal fines imposed by the Federal Communications Commission or fines of up to $1,500 per violation imposed through private litigation or by state authorities. Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards may govern data privacy and security. For example, Canada’s PIPEDA imposes strict requirements for processing personal data.

In addition to data privacy and security laws, the Company is bound, or may become bound, by other obligations related to data privacy and security, including contractual obligations and self-regulatory standards (e.g., PCI-DSS) and its efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. For example, we rely on vendors to process payment card data who may be subject to PCI-DSS, and our business may be negatively impacted if our vendors are fined or suffer other consequences as a result of PCI-DSS noncompliance. Additionally, the Company publishes privacy policies, marketing materials, and other public or external facing statements. If found to be deficient, lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of facts or its practices, the Company may be subject to investigation, enforcement actions by regulators, or experience other adverse consequences.

Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires the Company to devote significant resources and may necessitate changes to its services, information technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on its behalf.

The Company may at times fail, or be perceived to have failed, in its efforts to comply with its data privacy and security obligations. Moreover, despite its efforts, the Company’s personnel or third parties on whom it relies may fail to comply with such obligations, which could negatively impact its business operations. If the Company or the third parties on which it relies fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with applicable data privacy and security obligations, it could face significant consequences, including but not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-action claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; and orders to destroy or not use personal data. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize its products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or substantial changes to its business model or operations.

The Company faces exposure to fraudulent or illegal activity by employees, contractors and consultants, which may subject the Company to investigations or other actions.

The Company is exposed to the risk that its employees, independent contractors and consultants may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to the Company that violates: (i) government regulations; (ii) manufacturing standards; (iii) federal, state and provincial healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations; or (iv) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. It may not always be possible for the Company to identify and deter misconduct by its employees and other third parties, and the precautions taken by the Company to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting the Company from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against the Company, and it is not successful in defending itself or asserting its rights, those actions could have a significant impact on the Companyʼs business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of the Companyʼs operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Directors and officers of the Company have faced, and may in the future face, conflicts of interests regarding the business strategy of the Company.

Certain of the directors and officers of the Company are also directors and officers of other companies or are engaged and will continue to be engaged in activities that may put them in conflict with the business strategy of the Company. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors and officers to be in a position of conflict.

In particular, the Company may also become involved in other transactions which conflict with the interests of its directors and officers, who may from time-to-time deal with persons, firms, institutions or companies with which the Company may be dealing, or which may be seeking investments similar to those desired by it. All decisions to be made by directors and officers of the Company are required to be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. In addition, the directors and officers are required to declare their interests in, and such directors are required to refrain from voting on, any matter in which they may have a material conflict of interest. Failure to adequately manage or disclose conflicts of interest may result in public accusations, investigations, or litigation, and could have material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.

The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective, and the Company’s independent auditors may not be able to certify as to their effectiveness, which could have a significant and adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"). Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Company is required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of its internal control over financial reporting to allow Company management to report on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, if at such time, the Company no longer qualifies as an "emerging growth company," its independent registered public accounting firm will be required to issue an annual report that attests to the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

The Company incurs expenses and diversion of Company management’s time in its efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause the Company to fail to meet its reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by the Company conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the subsequent testing by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm when required, may reveal deficiencies in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retrospective changes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Moreover, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objective will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If the Company is unable to assert that its internal control over financial reporting is effective, investors could lose confidence in the Company's reported financial information, the trading price of the Company's Common Shares could decline and the Company

could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or other regulatory authorities.

The Company’s business could be adversely affected by economic downturns, inflation, increases in interest rates, natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, geopolitical events, such as the war in Ukraine and the hostilities in the Middle East, or other macroeconomic conditions, which have in the past and may in the future negatively impact the Company’s business and financial performance.

The global economy, including credit and financial markets, has experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including, among other things, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, supply chain shortages, increases in inflation rates, higher interest rates and uncertainty about economic stability. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in widespread unemployment, economic slowdown and extreme volatility in the capital markets. The U.S. Federal Reserve recently raised interest rates multiple times in response to concerns about inflation and it may raise them again. Higher interest rates, coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets may increase economic uncertainty and affect consumer spending. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, including as a result of political unrest or war, such as the war in Ukraine and the hostilities in the Middle East, may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult to obtain in a timely manner or on favorable terms, more costly or more dilutive. Increased inflation rates can adversely affect the Company by increasing the Company’s costs, including labor and employee benefit costs.

The Company may not have access to United States bankruptcy protections available to non-cannabis businesses.

Because cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, courts may deny cannabis businesses federal bankruptcy protections, making it difficult for lenders to be made whole on their investments in the cannabis industry in the event of a bankruptcy. If the Company were to experience a bankruptcy, there is no guarantee that United States federal bankruptcy protections would be available to us, which would have a material adverse effect on us and may make it more difficult for us to obtain debt financing.

The development of the Company’s products is complex and requires significant investment. Failure to develop new methodologies and products could adversely affect the Company’s business.

The introduction of new products embodying new methodologies, including new manufacturing processes, and the emergence of new industry standards may render the Companyʼs products obsolete, less competitive or less marketable. The process of developing the Companyʼs products is complex and requires significant continuing costs, development efforts and third-party commitments. The Companyʼs failure to develop new methodologies and products and the obsolescence of existing methodologies could adversely affect the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company. The Company may be unable to anticipate changes in its potential customer requirements that could make the Companyʼs existing methodologies obsolete.

The development of the Companyʼs proprietary methodologies entails significant technical and business risks. The Company may not be successful in using its new methodologies or exploiting its niche markets effectively or adapting its businesses to evolving customer or medical requirements or preferences or emerging industry standards.

The Company needs to attract and retain customers and patients in order to succeed, and failure to do so may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Companyʼs success depends on its ability to attract and retain customers and patients. There are many factors which could impact the Companyʼs ability to attract and retain customers and patients, including but not limited to the Companyʼs ability to continually produce desirable and effective products and, the successful implementation of a customer and patient-acquisition plan. The Companyʼs failure to acquire and retain customers and patients would have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, operating results and financial condition.

The Company has a limited operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate its prospects and predict future operating results.

The Company has a limited operating history and, accordingly, potential investors will have a limited basis on which to evaluate its ability to achieve its business objectives. The future success of the Company is dependent on management’s ability to implement its strategy, there is no certainty that anticipated outcomes and sustainable revenue streams will be achieved and there is no certainty that the Company will successfully produce commercial cannabis, establish a market for and sell its product, maintain its licenses or obtain other necessary licenses and/or approvals.

The Company faces risks frequently encountered by early-stage companies. In particular, its future growth and prospects will depend on its ability to expand its operation and gain additional revenue streams while at the same time maintaining effective cost controls. Any failure to expand is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition, and results. As such, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in achieving a return on the Company shareholders’ investment and the likelihood of success must be considered in light of the early stage of operations.

The Company may be subject to growth-related risks, which could negatively affect its business.

The Company may be subject to growth-related risks including capacity constraints and pressure on its internal systems and controls. The ability of the Company to manage growth effectively will require it to continue to implement and improve its operational and financial systems and to expand, train and manage its employee base. The inability of the Company to deal with this growth may have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to the Company’s Investment and Acquisition Business Strategies

The success of the Companyʼs business depends, in part, on its ability to successfully integrate recently acquired businesses and to retain key employees of acquired businesses. If the Company is unsuccessful in doing so, it may negatively affect the Companyʼs business.

The Company may not be able to successfully integrate and combine the operations, personnel, and technology infrastructure of any such acquired company with its existing operations. If integration is not managed successfully by the Companyʼs management, the Company may experience interruptions to its business activities, deterioration in its employee and customer relationships, increased costs of integration and harm to its reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition, and results of operations. The Company may experience difficulties in combining corporate cultures, maintaining employee morale, and retaining key employees. The integration of any such acquired companies may also impose substantial demands on management. There is no assurance that these acquisitions will be successfully integrated in a timely manner, or at all.

There can be no assurance that the Company’s current and future strategic alliances will have a beneficial impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The Company currently has, and may in the future, enter into strategic alliances with third parties it believes will complement or augment its existing business. The Companyʼs ability to complete strategic alliances is dependent upon, and may be limited by, the availability of suitable candidates and capital. In addition, strategic alliances could present unforeseen integration obstacles or costs, may not enhance the Companyʼs business, and may involve risks that could adversely affect the Company, including significant amounts of management time that may be diverted from operations in order to pursue and complete such transactions or maintain such strategic alliances. Future strategic alliances could result in the incurrence of additional debt, costs and contingent liabilities, and there can be no assurance that future strategic alliances will achieve, or that the Companyʼs existing strategic alliances will continue to achieve, the expected benefits to the Companyʼs business or that the Company will be able to consummate future strategic alliances on satisfactory terms, or at all. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Companyʼs business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s use of joint ventures may expose it to risks associated with jointly owned investments.

The Company currently operates parts of its business through joint ventures with other companies, and it may enter into additional joint ventures or partnerships in the future. Joint venture investments and partnerships may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including: (i) the Company may not control the joint ventures; (ii) the Company’s joint venture partners may not agree to distributions that it believe are appropriate; (iii) where the Company does not have substantial decision-making authority, it may experience impasses or disputes with the Company’s joint venture partners on certain decisions, which could require it to expend additional resources to resolve such impasses or disputes, including litigation or arbitration; (iv) the Company’s joint venture partners may become insolvent or bankrupt, fail to fund their share of required capital contributions or fail to fulfil their obligations as a joint venture partner; (v) the arrangements governing the Company’s joint ventures may contain certain conditions or milestone events that may never be satisfied or achieved; (vi) the Company’s joint venture partners may have business or economic interests that are inconsistent with the Company’s and may take actions contrary to the Company’s interests; (vii) the Company may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by the Company’s joint venture partners with respect to the Company’s joint venture investments; and (viii) it may be difficult for the Company to exit a joint venture if an impasse arises or if the Company desires to sell its interest for any reason. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of its joint venture partners.

The Company may not realize the benefits of its growth strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its business.

As part of its growth strategy, the Company will continue in its existing efforts to go deeper in existing states and initiate new efforts to expand its footprint, and brands. Such expansion is dependent on availability of capital funding, continuing to enter into successful business arrangements and receiving satisfactory regulatory and shareholder approvals, as required. The failure to successfully implement its strategic initiatives could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

Risks Related to the Common Shares

The Company’s voting control is concentrated.

Mr. Jason Wild, the Companyʼs Executive Chairman of the Board, beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over shares representing approximately 31.04% of the voting capital stock of the Company as of March 14, 2024. As a result, Mr. Wild exerts significant control over matters that may be put forward for the consideration of all the Company shareholders, including for example, the approval of a potential business combination or consolidation, a liquidation or sale of all or substantially all of the Companyʼs assets, electing members to the Board, and adopting amendments to the Companyʼs constating documents, including its articles of incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”) and by-laws.

The Preferred Shares have a liquidation preference over the Common Shares, which could limit the Company’s ability to make distributions to the holders of Common Shares.

In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or upon any other return of capital or distribution of the assets of the Company among its shareholders, in each case for the purposes of winding up its affairs, the Preferred Shares are entitled to receive any distribution available to be paid out of the assets of the Company before the Proportionate Voting Shares, Common Shares and non-participating non-voting exchangeable shares in the capital of the Company ("Exchangeable Shares"). Accordingly, should the Company be liquidated, dissolved or wound-up, the Company may be unable to make any distribution to the holders of the Common Shares.

An investor may face liquidity risks with an investment in the Common Shares.

The Common Shares are listed on the TSX and the OTCQX, however, there can be no assurance that an active and/or liquid market for Common Shares will develop or be maintained and an investor may find it difficult to resell any securities of the Company. For example, given the heightened risk profile associated with cannabis in the United States, capital markets participants may be unwilling to assist with the settlement of trades for U.S. resident securityholders of companies with operations in the U.S. cannabis industry, which may prohibit or significantly impair the ability of securityholders in the United States to trade the Company's securities. In the event residents of the United States are unable to settle trades of the Company's securities, this may affect the pricing of such securities in the secondary market, the transparency and availability of trading prices and the liquidity of these securities.

The price of the Common Shares may be volatile, and may be adversely affected by the price of cannabis.

The market price of the Common Shares may be subject to wide price fluctuations, and the price of the Common Shares, as well as the Companyʼs financial results, may be significantly and adversely affected by a decline in the price of cannabis. There is currently no established market price for cannabis and the price of cannabis is affected by several factors beyond the Companyʼs control. For example, price fluctuations may be in response to many factors, including variations in the operating results of the Company and its subsidiaries, divergence in financial results from analysts’ expectations, changes in earnings estimates by stock market analysts, changes in the business prospects for the Company and its subsidiaries, general economic conditions, legislative changes, community support for the cannabis industry and other events and factors outside of the Companyʼs control. In addition, stock markets have from time-to-time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which, as well as general economic and political conditions, could adversely affect the market price for the Common Shares.

Additional issuances of the Company’s securities may result in dilution.

The Company may issue additional securities in the future, which may dilute a shareholder of the Company's holdings in the Company. The Companyʼs Articles permit the issuance of an unlimited number of Proportionate Voting Shares, Exchangeable Shares, Preferred Shares and Common Shares, and shareholders of the Company will have no pre-emptive rights in connection with such further issuance. The Board have discretion to determine the price and the terms of issue of further issuances, and such terms could include rights, preferences and privileges superior to those existing holders. Moreover, additional Common Shares will be issued by the Company on the exercise of options under the Companyʼs stock option plan (the "Stock Option Plan") and upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and upon the conversion of Proportionate Voting Shares, Exchangeable

Shares and Preferred Shares. To the extent holders of the Company’s stock options or other convertible securities convert or exercise their securities and sell the Common Shares they receive, the trading price of the Common Shares may decrease due to the additional amount of Common Shares available in the market. The Company cannot predict the size or nature of future issuances or the effect that future issuances and sales of Common Shares will have on the market price of the Common Shares. Issuances of a substantial number of additional Common Shares, or the perception that such issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Shares. With any additional issuance of Common Shares, investors will suffer dilution to their voting power and economic interest in the Company.

Sales of substantial amounts of Common Shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Common Shares.

Sales of a substantial number of Common Shares in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the market perception that the holders of a large number of Common Shares intend to sell Common Shares, could reduce the market price of Common Shares.

The Company’s management will continue to have broad discretion over the use of the proceeds the Company receives in its public offerings, private placements, warrant exercises and loans, as applicable, and might not apply the proceeds in ways that increase the value of your investment.

The Company’s management will continue to have broad discretion to use the net proceeds from its public offerings, private placements warrant exercises and loans, as applicable, and you will be relying on the judgment of the Company’s management regarding the application of these proceeds. The Company’s management might not apply the Company’s net proceeds in ways that ultimately increase the value of your investment. Because of the number and variability of factors that will ultimately influence how the Company uses net proceeds from its public offerings and other financing transactions, the Company’s use of proceeds may vary substantially from their currently intended use. If the Company does not invest or apply the net proceeds from its public offerings, private placements, warrant exercises and loans in ways that enhance shareholder value, it may fail to achieve the expected financial results, which could cause its share price to decline.

Risks related to potential disqualification of equity holders by regulatory authorities.

An individual with an ownership interest in the Company could become disqualified from having such ownership interest in the Company under a U.S. state cannabis agency’s interpretation of the relevant state laws and regulations if such owner is convicted of a certain type of felony or fails to meet the residency requirements, if any, for owning equity in a company like the Company The loss of such equity holder could potentially have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company does not intend to pay dividends on its Common Shares for the foreseeable future and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of the Common Shares.

The Company’s policy is to retain earnings to finance the development and enhancement of its products and to otherwise reinvest in the Companyʼs businesses. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends on Common Shares in the foreseeable future. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of the Board and will depend on, among other things, financial results, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors that the Board may deem relevant. As a result, investors may not receive any return on investment in Common Shares unless they sell them for a share price that is greater than that at which such investors purchased them.

“Penny stock” rules may make buying or selling the Company’s securities difficult which may make its securities less liquid and make it harder for investors to buy and sell such securities.

Trading in the Company’s securities is subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules and it is anticipated that trading in the Company’s securities will continue to be subject to the penny stock rules for the foreseeable future. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any broker-dealer who recommends the Company’s securities to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending transactions in the Company’s securities, which could severely limit the liquidity of such securities and consequently adversely affect the market price for such securities.

“Cannabis related business” rules or policies may restrict certain financial institutions from holding the Company’s securities which may make its securities less liquid.

Certain financial institutions have implemented “cannabis related business” rules or policies that prohibit or restrict the trading in cannabis related securities. Trading in the Company securities may be prohibited by certain financial institutions and therefore the Company’s securities may have limited liquidity. Holders of the Company securities may face limitations or be unable to deposit their securities with a brokerage institution.

General Risk Factors

The Company may not be able to obtain necessary permits and authorizations.

The Company may be required to obtain and maintain certain permits, licenses and approvals in the jurisdictions where its products are manufactured and/or sold. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain any necessary licenses, permits or approvals. Any material delay or inability to receive these items is likely to delay and/or inhibit the Companyʼs ability to conduct its business, and would have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to the uncertainty regarding the implementation of the CARES Act and other legislation related to COVID-19, and their application to businesses in the cannabis industry there is a risk that that a determination could be made that the Company is not eligible for the ERC distributions it has received, which may negatively impact the Company.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law, aimed at providing emergency assistance and health care for individuals, families, and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and generally supporting the U.S. economy. The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, and modifications to the net interest deduction limitations. In December 2022, the Company filed for an Employee Retention Tax Credit (“ERC”) distribution in the amount of approximately $14,903. ERC distributions are refundable tax credits for 50% of qualified wages paid to employees during the pandemic. A company is eligible for the ERC if it has not received a Paycheck Protection Program loan under the CARES Act and (i) its operations have been fully or partially suspended because of COVID-19 or (ii) its gross receipts in a calendar quarter in 2020 declined by more than 50% from the same period in 2019.

No formal determination has been made regarding the Company’s eligibility to receive ERC or if companies in the cannabis industry are generally eligible to receive ERC. There is a risk that a determination could be made that the Company, due to its operations or the nature of its business, is not eligible for the ERC distributions it has received. Additionally, there is a risk that if this determination is made that the Company may not be able to repay the funds in the required timeframe and could be subject to additional penalties, which may negatively impact the Company.

The Company may be subject to litigation, which could divert the attention of management and cause the Company to expend significant resources.

The Company may become party to litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business which could adversely affect its business. Should any litigation in which the Company becomes involved be determined against the Company, such a decision could adversely affect the Companyʼs ability to continue operating and the market price for Common Shares. Even if the Company is involved in litigation and wins, litigation can redirect significant resources.

The Company faces risks and hazards that may not be covered by insurance.

The Companyʼs business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally, including adverse environmental conditions, accidents, disputes and changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could result in damage to assets, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in operations, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

Although the Company maintains insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers to be reasonable, its insurance does not cover all the potential risks associated with its operations. The Company may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards encountered in the operations of the Company is not generally available on acceptable terms. Losses from these events may cause the Company to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations.

The Company has incurred and will continue to incur substantial costs as a result of operating as a public company in Canada and the United States, and its management will continue to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

The Common Shares are listed on the TSX under the ticker symbol “TSND.” The Common Shares also trade over the counter in the United States on OTCQX under the ticker symbol “TSNDF.” As a public company, the Company incurs substantial legal, accounting, and other expenses that it would not incur as a private company. For example, the Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Exchange Act and Securities Act (Ontario) require, among other things, that the Company file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to its business, financial condition and results of operations. Compliance with these rules and regulations increase the Company’s legal and financial compliance costs and increase demand on its systems, particularly after the Company is no longer an emerging growth company. In addition, as a public company, the Company may be subject to shareholder activism, which can lead to additional substantial costs, distract management and impact the manner in which the Company operates its business in ways it cannot currently anticipate. As a result of disclosure of information in filings required of a public company, the Company’s business and financial condition are more visible, which may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors.

The Company is currently an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and to the extent the Company has taken advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, this could make its securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare the Company’s performance with other public companies.

The Company is an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and the Company may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in the Company’s periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, the Company’s shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. the Company could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause the Company to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of its Common Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000 as of the last business day of the Company’s most recent second fiscal quarter, in which case the Company would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year. The Company cannot predict whether investors will find its securities less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find the Company’s securities less attractive as a result of its reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of its securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for the securities and the trading prices of its securities may be more volatile.

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Risk management and strategy

The Company has implemented and maintain various information security processes designed to identify, assess, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats to our critical computer networks, third party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, and our critical data, including intellectual property, confidential information that is proprietary, strategic or competitive in nature, and patient data (“Information Systems and Data”).

The Company’s cybersecurity function, led by our Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) and Director of IT Operations, helps identify, assess, and manage the Company’s cybersecurity threats and risks. The Company’s CIO has over twenty-five years of technology leadership experience including infrastructure design and management, software development, system implementation, cybersecurity, and network design administration. The Company’s CIO has proven success in data protection for systems and has supported a complex global public enterprise environment with operations in over 200 countries. The Company’s Director of IT Operations has over ten years of experience developing and leading healthcare solutions and has led the development in web and infrastructure design, serverless architecture, database integrations, SMS, mass-email and mass phone notification solutions. The Company’s Director of IT Operations has dealt directly with numerous cyber security threats, breaches, detection and containment activities and strategies under strict requirements and expectations for HIPAA covered entities. The Company’s cybersecurity team works in partnership with our managed security service provider (“MSSP”) and managed service provider (“MSP”) to help identify, assess, and respond to risks from cybersecurity threats. The Company’s Security Incident Response Team leverages a cybersecurity managed detection and response partner, which monitors certain of our endpoints, cloud infrastructure, and networks for irregular activity.

Depending on the environment and system, the Company implements and maintains various technical, physical, and organizational measures, processes, standards, and policies designed to manage and mitigate material risks from cybersecurity threats to our Information Systems and Data, including, for example: an incident response plan, monitoring and response services in certain environments and systems, system access controls for certain systems, an employee cybersecurity training program, asset management and recovery processes, penetration testing, dark web monitoring, monthly environment risk reviews, external threat intelligence reports, regular digital infrastructure scans, internally reported threats, and cybersecurity insurance.

The Company’s assessment and management of material risks from cybersecurity threats are integrated into the Company’s overall risk management processes. For example, cybersecurity risk is identified in the Company’s risk register detailing certain known and potential risk items; the Company’s IT operations department works with our MSSP/MSP vendor partners to review certain identified threats and our cybersecurity practices in an effort to prioritize and mitigate cybersecurity threats that are more likely to lead to a material impact on our business; and our CIO regularly presents to senior management, the Board and Audit Committee to evaluate material risks relative to our overall business objectives.

The Company uses third-party service providers to assist us from time to time to identify, assess, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats including, for example, managed cybersecurity service providers, cybersecurity software providers, penetration testing firms, and professional services firms, including legal counsel.

The Company uses third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions throughout our business, such as enterprise resource planning, point of sale, eCommerce, wholesale sales, and web hosting. We have a vendor management program to manage cybersecurity risks associated with our use of these providers. Our vendor management program includes completion of a cybersecurity questionnaire for certain vendors designed to help us evaluate the potential cybersecurity risks associated with our use of the vendor. Depending on the nature of the services provided, the sensitivity of the Information Systems and Data at issue, and the identity of the provider, our vendor management process may involve different levels of assessment designed to help identify cybersecurity risks associated with a provider and impose contractual obligations related to cybersecurity on the provider.

For a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect the Company and how they may do so, see the risk factors under Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report, including “The Company (and the third parties upon which

it relies) faces physical security risks, as well as risks related to its information technology systems, potential cyber-attacks, and security breaches.”.

Governance

The Board addresses the Company’s cybersecurity risk management as part of its general oversight function. The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s cybersecurity risk management processes, including oversight and mitigation of risks from cybersecurity threats.

The Company's cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes are implemented and maintained by certain Company management, the CIO and the Director of IT Operations. The CIO is responsible for hiring appropriate personnel, helping to integrate cybersecurity risk considerations into the Company’s overall risk management strategy, and communicating key priorities to relevant personnel. The CIO is responsible for approving budgets, helping prepare for cybersecurity incidents, approving cybersecurity processes, and reviewing security assessments and other security-related reports.

Our cybersecurity incident response and vulnerability management processes are designed to escalate certain cybersecurity incidents to members of management depending on the circumstances, including the security management department, CIO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and others. The security management department, CIO, CFO, CEO, and others work with the Company’s incident response team to help the Company mitigate and remediate cybersecurity incidents of which they are notified. In addition, the Company’s incident response and vulnerability management processes includes reporting to the Board for certain cybersecurity incidents.

The Board receives regular reports from the CIO concerning the Company’s significant cybersecurity threats and risks and the processes the Company has implemented to address them. These reports also include materials related to certain cybersecurity trends we have identified, potential cybersecurity threats and risk, and proposed mitigation measures.

Item 2. Properties

TerrAscend's corporate headquarters is located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and the Issuer’s registered office is in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. In addition, the Company has various other offices, manufacturing, cultivation and/or processing facilities and dispensaries across the United States. The Company believes that its current offices and facilities are suitable and adequate to meet its current needs. The Company intends to add new facilities or expand existing facilities as it adds employees, and it believes that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any such expansion of the Company's operations.

The following tables set forth the Company’s material physical properties as of March 14, 2024.